Shaping circular construction and demolition waste policy: a comparative study of the United Kingdom and the United Arab Emirates

The construction sector is a significant global contributor to resource consumption, waste generation, and carbon emissions, making the adoption of Circular Economy (CE) principles crucial for sustainable development and decarbonization. This study conducts a comparative analysis of construction and demolition waste (CDW) management strategies in the United Kingdom (UK) and the United Arab Emirates (UAE), two countries that represent distinct regulatory and economic models. The UK’s compliance-driven approach, characterized by Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR), landfill taxation, and mandatory digital tracking, has institutionalized material recovery; however, it continues to rely on downcycling and faces challenges related to market standardization and integration with SMEs. Meanwhile, the UAE’s innovation-led, incentive-driven strategy has stimulated early-stage circular practices through public investment and flagship projects; however, it struggles with enforcement gaps and fragmented secondary markets. The analysis highlights that neither strict regulation nor voluntary incentives alone ensure the adoption of systemic CE. Grounded in a comparative, multi-level institutional perspective, the study develops a hybrid implementation model that integrates regulatory enforcement, innovation facilitation, and market incentives to enhance circularity across the construction value chain. The model is structured around five strategic pillars and supported by enabling conditions such as governance capacity and institutional coordination. It promotes a shift from basic recovery to higher-value circularity through strategies such as design for deconstruction and digital traceability. The study concludes with strategic recommendations for policymakers and industry stakeholders to strengthen regulatory frameworks, enhance technological integration, and foster inclusive market development for sustainable and low-carbon construction.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environment Development and Sustainability
Published
2026-03-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-026-07435-w
Primary Topic
Recycled Aggregate Concrete Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Shaping circular construction and demolition waste policy: a comparative study of the United Kingdom and the United Arab Emirates

Ruoyu Jin, Shadeedha Mohamed Saradara, Juan Carlos Flores Lara, Malik Khalfan et al.
Environment Development and Sustainability
Recycled Aggregate Concrete Performance
article

Shaping circular construction and demolition waste policy: a comparative study of the United Kingdom and the United Arab Emirates

Ruoyu Jin, Shadeedha Mohamed Saradara, Juan Carlos Flores Lara, Malik Khalfan, M. Reza Hosseini
article en

Abstract

The construction sector is a significant global contributor to resource consumption, waste generation, and carbon emissions, making the adoption of Circular Economy (CE) principles crucial for sustainable development and decarbonization. This study conducts a comparative analysis of construction and demolition waste (CDW) management strategies in the United Kingdom (UK) and the United Arab Emirates (UAE), two countries that represent distinct regulatory and economic models. The UK’s compliance-driven approach, characterized by Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR), landfill taxation, and mandatory digital tracking, has institutionalized material recovery; however, it continues to rely on downcycling and faces challenges related to market standardization and integration with SMEs. Meanwhile, the UAE’s innovation-led, incentive-driven strategy has stimulated early-stage circular practices through public investment and flagship projects; however, it struggles with enforcement gaps and fragmented secondary markets. The analysis highlights that neither strict regulation nor voluntary incentives alone ensure the adoption of systemic CE. Grounded in a comparative, multi-level institutional perspective, the study develops a hybrid implementation model that integrates regulatory enforcement, innovation facilitation, and market incentives to enhance circularity across the construction value chain. The model is structured around five strategic pillars and supported by enabling conditions such as governance capacity and institutional coordination. It promotes a shift from basic recovery to higher-value circularity through strategies such as design for deconstruction and digital traceability. The study concludes with strategic recommendations for policymakers and industry stakeholders to strengthen regulatory frameworks, enhance technological integration, and foster inclusive market development for sustainable and low-carbon construction.

Environment Development and Sustainability
The University of Melbourne (AU), Khalifa University of Science and Technology (AE), Brunel University of London (GB)
European Commission, Khalifa University of Science, Technology and Research
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Recycled Aggregate Concrete Performance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.