DeafSpace and the city: Theorizing transgression, identity, and the politics of belonging in urban planning

This article presents the first sustained engagement with DeafSpace within urban planning theory. While DeafSpace—a design framework formally developed at Gallaudet University in Washington, D.C., in 2005—has influenced architectural design by centering Deaf cultural practices and visual-tactile communication, its broader urban implications remain unexplored in the literature. We reposition DeafSpace as a radical planning imaginary challenging phonocentric norms and technocratic regimes. Drawing predominantly on disability and Crip theory, we theorize DeafSpace as a transgressive praxis grounded in interdependence, care, and spatial agency. We offer a set of provisional recommendations for planners, not as a comprehensive blueprint, but as an opening toward reimagining the normative foundations of planning which DeafSpace unsettles. Finally, we conclude with thoughts on the future of DeafSpace research in urban planning, emphasizing the necessity to attend to the Global South and its growing Deaf community.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Planning Theory
Published
2026-03-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/14730952261430807
Primary Topic
Hearing Impairment and Communication
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

DeafSpace and the city: Theorizing transgression, identity, and the politics of belonging in urban planning

Richard Kirk, Derrick J Behm
Planning Theory
Hearing Impairment and Communication
article

DeafSpace and the city: Theorizing transgression, identity, and the politics of belonging in urban planning

Richard Kirk, Derrick J Behm
article en

Abstract

This article presents the first sustained engagement with DeafSpace within urban planning theory. While DeafSpace—a design framework formally developed at Gallaudet University in Washington, D.C., in 2005—has influenced architectural design by centering Deaf cultural practices and visual-tactile communication, its broader urban implications remain unexplored in the literature. We reposition DeafSpace as a radical planning imaginary challenging phonocentric norms and technocratic regimes. Drawing predominantly on disability and Crip theory, we theorize DeafSpace as a transgressive praxis grounded in interdependence, care, and spatial agency. We offer a set of provisional recommendations for planners, not as a comprehensive blueprint, but as an opening toward reimagining the normative foundations of planning which DeafSpace unsettles. Finally, we conclude with thoughts on the future of DeafSpace research in urban planning, emphasizing the necessity to attend to the Global South and its growing Deaf community.

Planning Theory
University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Hearing Impairment and Communication
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.