The missing link: how new institutions could improve what we read online

While the EU’s Digital Services Act (DSA) and the UK’s Online Safety Act (OSA) represent a major shift in internet regulation, they suffer from a critical structural gap. These frameworks focus primarily on ‘defensive empowerment’— enabling users to block or report unwanted content — while neglecting constructive empowerment — the ability of users to decide what information they wish to see. The paper argues that without collective institutions to signal content quality, users cannot assess quality beforehand, creating a market failure that pushes out expensive, high-quality content in favour of cheap, sensationalist, algorithm-driven content. To bridge this gap, the paper proposes the creation of Trusted Content Creators (TCCs): voluntary, self-governing groups of like-minded content creators that certify content quality through cross-platform labels. By mandating that platforms allow users to filter their feeds through these external quality signals, the law can decentre the role of algorithmic curation and create new markets.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science)
Published
2026-02-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqag013
Primary Topic
Copyright and Intellectual Property
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The missing link: how new institutions could improve what we read online

Martin Husovec
London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science)
Copyright and Intellectual Property
article

The missing link: how new institutions could improve what we read online

Martin Husovec
article en

Abstract

While the EU’s Digital Services Act (DSA) and the UK’s Online Safety Act (OSA) represent a major shift in internet regulation, they suffer from a critical structural gap. These frameworks focus primarily on ‘defensive empowerment’— enabling users to block or report unwanted content — while neglecting constructive empowerment — the ability of users to decide what information they wish to see. The paper argues that without collective institutions to signal content quality, users cannot assess quality beforehand, creating a market failure that pushes out expensive, high-quality content in favour of cheap, sensationalist, algorithm-driven content. To bridge this gap, the paper proposes the creation of Trusted Content Creators (TCCs): voluntary, self-governing groups of like-minded content creators that certify content quality through cross-platform labels. By mandating that platforms allow users to filter their feeds through these external quality signals, the law can decentre the role of algorithmic curation and create new markets.

London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Copyright and Intellectual Property
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The missing link: how new institutions could improve what we read online — Martin Husovec · London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS