Artificial Intelligence-Aided Detection of Breast Cancer Using Elastography: A Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy

Breast cancer (BC) remains a major global health burden, consistently standing as the foremost contributor to cancer-related illness and death among women across the world. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of AI-assisted ultrasound elastography (UE) for BC detection by considering various factors, such as AI models, segmentation, cross-validation, data augmentation, the evaluation phase, and the addition of conventional ultrasound. PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched from inception to 22 June 2025, for observational studies using any AI-aided UE modality in BC classification compared to histopathology. We extracted binary diagnostic accuracy data and employed the split component synthesis method for pooled outcomes. Out of 501 identified records, 39 studies (6191 samples) were included in the meta-analysis. The overall diagnostic performance showed 90.3% sensitivity (95% confidence interval [CI] 86.4–93.1%), 88.0% specificity (95% CI 83.6%–91.4), a positive likelihood ratio of 7.5 (95% CI 5.4–10.5), a negative likelihood ratio of 0.110 (95% CI 0.078–0.156), and a diagnostic odds ratio of 68.3 (95% CI 42.3–110.1). Heterogeneity was substantial (I2 = 78.0%), and the funnel plot demonstrated mild positive asymmetry. Subgroup analyses indicated improved diagnostic performance in studies that employed automatic or no segmentation, cross-validation, data augmentation, retrospective designs, models evaluated during the training phase, classical machine learning approaches, and the combination of B-mode ultrasound with elastography. Despite the presence of heterogeneity and the possibility of overestimation, AI-aided UE demonstrated superior diagnostic performance compared to UE alone. Researchers should consider adopting automatic segmentation, cross-validation, augmentation, and combining UE with conventional ultrasound. Our meta-analysis also explored the potential integration of AI-aided UE into breast cancer screening practices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AI
Published
2026-03-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ai7030107
Primary Topic
Ultrasound Imaging and Elastography
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Artificial Intelligence-Aided Detection of Breast Cancer Using Elastography: A Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy

Ibrahim Elmakaty, Amr Ouda, Mohammed Imad Malki, Ruba Abdo et al.
AI
Ultrasound Imaging and Elastography
article

Artificial Intelligence-Aided Detection of Breast Cancer Using Elastography: A Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy

Ibrahim Elmakaty, Amr Ouda, Mohammed Imad Malki, Ruba Abdo, Yaman A. Khamis, Mohamed Elmarasi, Mohamed Elahtem
article en

Abstract

Breast cancer (BC) remains a major global health burden, consistently standing as the foremost contributor to cancer-related illness and death among women across the world. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of AI-assisted ultrasound elastography (UE) for BC detection by considering various factors, such as AI models, segmentation, cross-validation, data augmentation, the evaluation phase, and the addition of conventional ultrasound. PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched from inception to 22 June 2025, for observational studies using any AI-aided UE modality in BC classification compared to histopathology. We extracted binary diagnostic accuracy data and employed the split component synthesis method for pooled outcomes. Out of 501 identified records, 39 studies (6191 samples) were included in the meta-analysis. The overall diagnostic performance showed 90.3% sensitivity (95% confidence interval [CI] 86.4–93.1%), 88.0% specificity (95% CI 83.6%–91.4), a positive likelihood ratio of 7.5 (95% CI 5.4–10.5), a negative likelihood ratio of 0.110 (95% CI 0.078–0.156), and a diagnostic odds ratio of 68.3 (95% CI 42.3–110.1). Heterogeneity was substantial (I2 = 78.0%), and the funnel plot demonstrated mild positive asymmetry. Subgroup analyses indicated improved diagnostic performance in studies that employed automatic or no segmentation, cross-validation, data augmentation, retrospective designs, models evaluated during the training phase, classical machine learning approaches, and the combination of B-mode ultrasound with elastography. Despite the presence of heterogeneity and the possibility of overestimation, AI-aided UE demonstrated superior diagnostic performance compared to UE alone. Researchers should consider adopting automatic segmentation, cross-validation, augmentation, and combining UE with conventional ultrasound. Our meta-analysis also explored the potential integration of AI-aided UE into breast cancer screening practices.

AIVol. 7(3)
Hamad Medical Corporation (QA), Qatar University (QA)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Ultrasound Imaging and Elastography
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.