A sociology without humans: Artificial intelligence as a threat to humanity, and sociology’s response

The growing deployment of ‘artificial intelligence’ (AI) systems across society, and massive investments currently being made to develop systems capable of greater and greater agency, necessitates sociological reflection. Specifically, what do current shifts in automation mean for how we theorize social relations, and how should sociologists position themselves normatively? While the development of agential machines might be seen to validate ‘posthuman’ critiques and ontologies, such as those seen in actor-network theory and ‘new materialist’ thought, they have also necessitated a humanist response. This is because the sociotechnical transformations of AI are accompanied by discourses that devalue what it means to be human, and have consequences that increasingly marginalize human agency, corrupt human knowledge, threaten human interests, and are experienced as dehumanizing. Reflecting on posthumanist and humanist strains in social theory, this article considers aspects of both that can be valuable in coming to terms with the social shifts of automation and new interactive technologies, but ultimately argues for a humanist stance to counteract AI’s anti-human tendencies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Current Sociology
Published
2026-03-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00113921261426574
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A sociology without humans: Artificial intelligence as a threat to humanity, and sociology’s response

Mike Zajko
Current Sociology
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

A sociology without humans: Artificial intelligence as a threat to humanity, and sociology’s response

Mike Zajko
article en

Abstract

The growing deployment of ‘artificial intelligence’ (AI) systems across society, and massive investments currently being made to develop systems capable of greater and greater agency, necessitates sociological reflection. Specifically, what do current shifts in automation mean for how we theorize social relations, and how should sociologists position themselves normatively? While the development of agential machines might be seen to validate ‘posthuman’ critiques and ontologies, such as those seen in actor-network theory and ‘new materialist’ thought, they have also necessitated a humanist response. This is because the sociotechnical transformations of AI are accompanied by discourses that devalue what it means to be human, and have consequences that increasingly marginalize human agency, corrupt human knowledge, threaten human interests, and are experienced as dehumanizing. Reflecting on posthumanist and humanist strains in social theory, this article considers aspects of both that can be valuable in coming to terms with the social shifts of automation and new interactive technologies, but ultimately argues for a humanist stance to counteract AI’s anti-human tendencies.

Current Sociology
University of British Columbia (CA)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.