Outcomes of Adult Patients With Acute Liver Dysfunction and Chronic Liver Disease Supported by Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation

The impact of acute liver dysfunction and chronic liver disease on adult patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support remains unclear. To investigate this, we performed a retrospective analysis of the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO) Registry using data from 2012 to 2023. We used generalized linear regression models (GLMs) to examine the associations between acute liver dysfunction, chronic liver disease, and survival to hospital discharge. A total of 4,915 ECMO runs were included in the analysis. Survival to hospital discharge was 34% for patients with acute liver dysfunction compared to 42% for those with chronic liver disease. Compared to patients with acute liver dysfunction, those with chronic liver disease were more likely to survive (~29% more likely). Increased age (odds ratio [OR] per year: 0.97, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.97-0.98, p < 0.001) and low bicarbonate levels (OR per unit: 0.79, 95% CI = 0.67-0.93, p = 0.005) were associated with lower odds of survival. There was no difference in ECMO-related complications based on liver dysfunction acuity. Patients with acute liver dysfunction and chronic liver disease both have unique challenges during ECMO; however, acute liver dysfunction appears to be disproportionately associated with poor outcomes. Further studies are needed to fully understand the impact of liver dysfunction on ECMO survival.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ASAIO Journal
Published
2026-03-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/mat.0000000000002688
Primary Topic
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Outcomes of Adult Patients With Acute Liver Dysfunction and Chronic Liver Disease Supported by Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation

Jonathan Curley, Brian J. Clouse, L Brannigan, Siny Tsang et al.
ASAIO Journal
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
article

Outcomes of Adult Patients With Acute Liver Dysfunction and Chronic Liver Disease Supported by Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation

Jonathan Curley, Brian J. Clouse, L Brannigan, Siny Tsang, Dustin Money, Akram M. Zaaqoq, Jared Beller, Michael Mazzeffi, Sung-Min Cho
article en

Abstract

The impact of acute liver dysfunction and chronic liver disease on adult patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support remains unclear. To investigate this, we performed a retrospective analysis of the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO) Registry using data from 2012 to 2023. We used generalized linear regression models (GLMs) to examine the associations between acute liver dysfunction, chronic liver disease, and survival to hospital discharge. A total of 4,915 ECMO runs were included in the analysis. Survival to hospital discharge was 34% for patients with acute liver dysfunction compared to 42% for those with chronic liver disease. Compared to patients with acute liver dysfunction, those with chronic liver disease were more likely to survive (~29% more likely). Increased age (odds ratio [OR] per year: 0.97, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.97-0.98, p < 0.001) and low bicarbonate levels (OR per unit: 0.79, 95% CI = 0.67-0.93, p = 0.005) were associated with lower odds of survival. There was no difference in ECMO-related complications based on liver dysfunction acuity. Patients with acute liver dysfunction and chronic liver disease both have unique challenges during ECMO; however, acute liver dysfunction appears to be disproportionately associated with poor outcomes. Further studies are needed to fully understand the impact of liver dysfunction on ECMO survival.

ASAIO Journal
Johns Hopkins University (US), Johns Hopkins Medicine (US), University of Virginia (US)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.