The PRO-CAR-T<sup>TM</sup> Study:Achieving excellence in patient and public involvement and engagement

Background: Patient and Public Involvement and Engagement (PPIE) is advocated in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) research, but implementation remains inconsistent and often suboptimal. Many barriers exist, including a lack of understanding about how to apply the principles of PPIE in practice. This paper offers an example of how PPIE can be meaningfully integrated into the development of a digital PRO system within the complex and rapidly evolving field of advanced therapies. The aims are to offer practical insights about how PPIE was conceptualised and operationalised in the context of this study, and use the lessons learned to inform future PPIE strategies for PRO research.<br/><br/>Methodology: Co-produced strategy and delivery plans for PPIE were developed by stakeholders, including patients, carers and members of the public, and drawing on national standards and best practice guidelines. This was followed by activities to recruit additional Patient and Public Partners, provide training, identify opportunities for PPIE and map these to key decision points in the research plan. The success of these strategies and activities was evaluated using a range of reflective and assessment methods, in which personal experiences and formal feedback were combined to assess impact and identify areas for improvement.<br/><br/>Results: Evaluation revealed that PPIE was successfully integrated across project management, study conduct, and dissemination, generating both research value and personal benefits. However, several conceptual, methodological, and practical challenges were encountered. Three key themes emerged: (i) the challenges of distinguishing between research and PPIE in PRO studies (ii) the factors that shape meaningful PPIE and research impact and (iii) areas for improvement. Early planning, finding the right people, and working co-productively were identified as critical facilitators.<br/><br/>Conclusions: Integrating excellent PPIE is achievable in PRO research, even in challenging contexts that involve life-threatening conditions and complex emerging therapies. Although barriers exist, our experience suggests many can be addressed and several actionable recommendations and resources are offered to strengthen PPIE in future PRO research. <br/>

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham)
Published
2026-03-03
Primary Topic
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The PRO-CAR-TTM Study:Achieving excellence in patient and public involvement and engagement

Karen Shaw, Vladyslava Yarosh, Ronjon Chakraverty, Melanie Calvert et al.
University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham)
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
article

The PRO-CAR-TTM Study:Achieving excellence in patient and public involvement and engagement

Karen Shaw, Vladyslava Yarosh, Ronjon Chakraverty, Melanie Calvert, Evelyn Chakera, Lester Pyatt, Mark Chatterley, Rebecca Lloyd, Christel; id_orcid 0000-0002-0878-1513 McMullan, Foram; id_orcid 0009-0004-3076-0593 Khatsuria, John Ansell, Paul Ferguson, Sarah E.; id_orcid 0000-0001-5656-1198 Hughes, Olalekan L.; id_orcid 0000-0001-9122-8251 Aiyegbusi, J. Devin; id_orcid 0000-0001-5762-7881 Peipert
article en

Abstract

Background: Patient and Public Involvement and Engagement (PPIE) is advocated in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) research, but implementation remains inconsistent and often suboptimal. Many barriers exist, including a lack of understanding about how to apply the principles of PPIE in practice. This paper offers an example of how PPIE can be meaningfully integrated into the development of a digital PRO system within the complex and rapidly evolving field of advanced therapies. The aims are to offer practical insights about how PPIE was conceptualised and operationalised in the context of this study, and use the lessons learned to inform future PPIE strategies for PRO research.<br/><br/>Methodology: Co-produced strategy and delivery plans for PPIE were developed by stakeholders, including patients, carers and members of the public, and drawing on national standards and best practice guidelines. This was followed by activities to recruit additional Patient and Public Partners, provide training, identify opportunities for PPIE and map these to key decision points in the research plan. The success of these strategies and activities was evaluated using a range of reflective and assessment methods, in which personal experiences and formal feedback were combined to assess impact and identify areas for improvement.<br/><br/>Results: Evaluation revealed that PPIE was successfully integrated across project management, study conduct, and dissemination, generating both research value and personal benefits. However, several conceptual, methodological, and practical challenges were encountered. Three key themes emerged: (i) the challenges of distinguishing between research and PPIE in PRO studies (ii) the factors that shape meaningful PPIE and research impact and (iii) areas for improvement. Early planning, finding the right people, and working co-productively were identified as critical facilitators.<br/><br/>Conclusions: Integrating excellent PPIE is achievable in PRO research, even in challenging contexts that involve life-threatening conditions and complex emerging therapies. Although barriers exist, our experience suggests many can be addressed and several actionable recommendations and resources are offered to strengthen PPIE in future PRO research. <br/>

University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham)
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.