The cost-effectiveness of placement restrictions of unhealthy food and drinks at end of aisles and checkouts in Australian supermarkets

Background:<br/>Obesity is a significant contributor to global morbidity and mortality, driven by rising consumption of unhealthy energy dense foods high in salt, sugar and fat (HFSS). Supermarkets, pivotal in food distribution, influence consumer choices through marketing strategies that regularly promote the purchase of unhealthy foods. Restricting the placement of unhealthy food and beverages in prominent supermarket locations is a promising intervention to reduce the purchase of unhealthy products. This study assesses the cost-effectiveness of a potential policy to restrict the placement of unhealthy foods at prominent locations in supermarkets like checkouts, end-of-aisles, and store entrances compared to the status quo (no policy).<br/>Methods:<br/>The impact of the proposed policy to restrict the placement of unhealthy foods on the distribution of Body Mass Index (BMI) in the 2024 Australian population was estimated. A previously validated multiple cohort Markov model (Assessing Cost Effectiveness-Obesity Policy model) was used to estimate the impact of the change in BMI on the epidemiology of nine obesity related diseases resulting in changes in long-term health outcomes quantified as health-adjusted life years (HALYs), and healthcare costs. Policy implementation and monitoring costs to government and retailers were estimated. The analyses were undertaken over the lifetime of the modelled population (100 years), adopting a limited societal perspective with results presented in 2024 values. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to evaluate the robustness of the results.<br/>Results:<br/>The placement restriction policy was estimated to result in a mean BMI reduction of 0.26 kg/m² for males and 0.21 kg/m² for females, corresponding to 0.37 million HALYs gained and reduced healthcare costs of A$4.45 billion over the lifetime of the population. The total cost of the policy was A$20 million. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the intervention’s cost-effectiveness across various scenarios.<br/>Conclusion:<br/>A policy to restrict retail marketing of unhealthy foods in supermarkets represents a potentially cost-effective intervention, estimated to produce long-term health gains and save costs. These findings support policy action to create healthier food retail environments.<br/>

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham)
Published
2026-03-08
Primary Topic
Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The cost-effectiveness of placement restrictions of unhealthy food and drinks at end of aisles and checkouts in Australian supermarkets

Huong Ngoc Quynh Tran, Bisola Osifowora, Emma; id_orcid 0000-0002-5462-1158 Frew, Jaithri Ananthapvan
University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham)
Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
article

The cost-effectiveness of placement restrictions of unhealthy food and drinks at end of aisles and checkouts in Australian supermarkets

Huong Ngoc Quynh Tran, Bisola Osifowora, Emma; id_orcid 0000-0002-5462-1158 Frew, Jaithri Ananthapvan
article en

Abstract

Background:<br/>Obesity is a significant contributor to global morbidity and mortality, driven by rising consumption of unhealthy energy dense foods high in salt, sugar and fat (HFSS). Supermarkets, pivotal in food distribution, influence consumer choices through marketing strategies that regularly promote the purchase of unhealthy foods. Restricting the placement of unhealthy food and beverages in prominent supermarket locations is a promising intervention to reduce the purchase of unhealthy products. This study assesses the cost-effectiveness of a potential policy to restrict the placement of unhealthy foods at prominent locations in supermarkets like checkouts, end-of-aisles, and store entrances compared to the status quo (no policy).<br/>Methods:<br/>The impact of the proposed policy to restrict the placement of unhealthy foods on the distribution of Body Mass Index (BMI) in the 2024 Australian population was estimated. A previously validated multiple cohort Markov model (Assessing Cost Effectiveness-Obesity Policy model) was used to estimate the impact of the change in BMI on the epidemiology of nine obesity related diseases resulting in changes in long-term health outcomes quantified as health-adjusted life years (HALYs), and healthcare costs. Policy implementation and monitoring costs to government and retailers were estimated. The analyses were undertaken over the lifetime of the modelled population (100 years), adopting a limited societal perspective with results presented in 2024 values. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to evaluate the robustness of the results.<br/>Results:<br/>The placement restriction policy was estimated to result in a mean BMI reduction of 0.26 kg/m² for males and 0.21 kg/m² for females, corresponding to 0.37 million HALYs gained and reduced healthcare costs of A$4.45 billion over the lifetime of the population. The total cost of the policy was A$20 million. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the intervention’s cost-effectiveness across various scenarios.<br/>Conclusion:<br/>A policy to restrict retail marketing of unhealthy foods in supermarkets represents a potentially cost-effective intervention, estimated to produce long-term health gains and save costs. These findings support policy action to create healthier food retail environments.<br/>

University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham)
Deakin University (AU), University of Applied Health Sciences (HR), Institute of Health Economics (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.