Parafoveal retinal function of epiretinal membrane foveoschisis: a pilot comparison among ERM phenotypes using MP-3 microperimetry

To compare structural and functional outcomes among three epiretinal membrane (ERM) phenotypes—ERM without ectopic inner foveal layers (EIFL), ERM with EIFL, and ERM foveoschisis (ERM-F)—and to explore the anatomical and functional characteristics of ERM-F in a single-center, retrospective pilot study. Thirty-two eyes of 32 patients undergoing pars plana vitrectomy were categorized as ERM (n = 16), EIFL (n = 11), or ERM-F (n = 5). Swept-source OCT quantified central macular thickness (CMT) and morphology (cystoid spaces, retinal surface wrinkling, ellipsoid zone disruption, posterior vitreous detachment). Functional assessments included best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA, logMAR), parafoveal retinal sensitivity measured by MP-3 microperimetry within the central 5°, and M-CHARTS (horizontal/vertical). Assessments were performed at baseline and 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively. Baseline demographic characteristics, fixation stability, and metamorphopsia scores were similar across groups. Baseline BCVA and CMT were worse in EIFL than in ERM or ERM-F (both p < 0.05). Cystoid spaces were more frequent in EIFL and ERM-F than in ERM (p < 0.001). CMT decreased in ERM and EIFL (both p < 0.01) but not in ERM-F. BCVA improved postoperatively in the ERM and EIFL groups, and no significant intergroup differences in BCVA were observed at any postoperative time point. In contrast, MP-3 microperimetry demonstrated persistently lower retinal sensitivity in the EIFL group compared with the ERM group at all postoperative time points (all p < 0.05), while ERM-F showed parafoveal sensitivity numerically close to ERM by 6 months. Metamorphopsia (M-CHARTS) did not differ among groups; only ERM showed significant postoperative improvement in horizontal scores. Despite characteristic parafoveal schisis, ERM-F demonstrated postoperative BCVA and parafoveal sensitivity comparable to typical ERM, while EIFL remained functionally worse. MP-3 can reveal focal deficits not captured by BCVA, underscoring the value of multimodal assessment. As an exploratory, hypothesis-generating pilot study, these findings suggest that ERM-F may represent a relatively milder tractional phenotype and warrant confirmation in larger, prospective studies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Ophthalmology
Published
2026-03-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-026-04726-8
Primary Topic
Retinal and Macular Surgery
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Parafoveal retinal function of epiretinal membrane foveoschisis: a pilot comparison among ERM phenotypes using MP-3 microperimetry

Hiroshi Toshida, Yasushi Kitaoka, Tatsuya Jujo, Naoto Uchiyama et al.
BMC Ophthalmology
Retinal and Macular Surgery
article

Parafoveal retinal function of epiretinal membrane foveoschisis: a pilot comparison among ERM phenotypes using MP-3 microperimetry

Hiroshi Toshida, Yasushi Kitaoka, Tatsuya Jujo, Naoto Uchiyama, Kota Kakehashi, Naoto Tokuda, Reio Sekine, Kaito Tomokiyo
article en

Abstract

To compare structural and functional outcomes among three epiretinal membrane (ERM) phenotypes—ERM without ectopic inner foveal layers (EIFL), ERM with EIFL, and ERM foveoschisis (ERM-F)—and to explore the anatomical and functional characteristics of ERM-F in a single-center, retrospective pilot study. Thirty-two eyes of 32 patients undergoing pars plana vitrectomy were categorized as ERM (n = 16), EIFL (n = 11), or ERM-F (n = 5). Swept-source OCT quantified central macular thickness (CMT) and morphology (cystoid spaces, retinal surface wrinkling, ellipsoid zone disruption, posterior vitreous detachment). Functional assessments included best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA, logMAR), parafoveal retinal sensitivity measured by MP-3 microperimetry within the central 5°, and M-CHARTS (horizontal/vertical). Assessments were performed at baseline and 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively. Baseline demographic characteristics, fixation stability, and metamorphopsia scores were similar across groups. Baseline BCVA and CMT were worse in EIFL than in ERM or ERM-F (both p < 0.05). Cystoid spaces were more frequent in EIFL and ERM-F than in ERM (p < 0.001). CMT decreased in ERM and EIFL (both p < 0.01) but not in ERM-F. BCVA improved postoperatively in the ERM and EIFL groups, and no significant intergroup differences in BCVA were observed at any postoperative time point. In contrast, MP-3 microperimetry demonstrated persistently lower retinal sensitivity in the EIFL group compared with the ERM group at all postoperative time points (all p < 0.05), while ERM-F showed parafoveal sensitivity numerically close to ERM by 6 months. Metamorphopsia (M-CHARTS) did not differ among groups; only ERM showed significant postoperative improvement in horizontal scores. Despite characteristic parafoveal schisis, ERM-F demonstrated postoperative BCVA and parafoveal sensitivity comparable to typical ERM, while EIFL remained functionally worse. MP-3 can reveal focal deficits not captured by BCVA, underscoring the value of multimodal assessment. As an exploratory, hypothesis-generating pilot study, these findings suggest that ERM-F may represent a relatively milder tractional phenotype and warrant confirmation in larger, prospective studies.

BMC Ophthalmology
St. Marianna University School of Medicine (JP)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Retinal and Macular Surgery
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.