Physics-informed neural networks for differential equation solutions: A comprehensive review

Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) embed governing differential equations into training, enabling solutions of ODEs and PDEs. This review consolidates theoretical foundations (expressive capacity, automatic differentiation) and core methods (loss design, constraint enforcement, sampling, optimization), while surveying applications from baseline PINNs to advanced variants such as multi-physics coupling, domain decomposition, frequency-enhanced representations, and operator-learning hybrids. Comparative synthesis links architectural and training choices to equation type, data conditions, and computational budgets. A unified benchmarking framework is proposed with standard PDE tasks, accuracy metrics, collocation budgets, and transparent reporting for fair comparison with classical solvers. Evidence positions PINNs as complementary to traditional methods-effective for inverse problems, data assimilation, irregular domains, and parametric inference-while challenges remain in scalability, spectral bias, constraint enforcement, and reproducibility. The review offers a coherent synthesis with actionable guidance for scientific and engineering applications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Neurocomputing
Published
2026-03-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2026.133317
Primary Topic
Model Reduction and Neural Networks
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Physics-informed neural networks for differential equation solutions: A comprehensive review

Vijay Kumar Kukreja, Indu Bala, Subarna Khanra
Neurocomputing
Model Reduction and Neural Networks
article

Physics-informed neural networks for differential equation solutions: A comprehensive review

Vijay Kumar Kukreja, Indu Bala, Subarna Khanra
article en

Abstract

Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) embed governing differential equations into training, enabling solutions of ODEs and PDEs. This review consolidates theoretical foundations (expressive capacity, automatic differentiation) and core methods (loss design, constraint enforcement, sampling, optimization), while surveying applications from baseline PINNs to advanced variants such as multi-physics coupling, domain decomposition, frequency-enhanced representations, and operator-learning hybrids. Comparative synthesis links architectural and training choices to equation type, data conditions, and computational budgets. A unified benchmarking framework is proposed with standard PDE tasks, accuracy metrics, collocation budgets, and transparent reporting for fair comparison with classical solvers. Evidence positions PINNs as complementary to traditional methods-effective for inverse problems, data assimilation, irregular domains, and parametric inference-while challenges remain in scalability, spectral bias, constraint enforcement, and reproducibility. The review offers a coherent synthesis with actionable guidance for scientific and engineering applications.

NeurocomputingVol. 680
The University of Adelaide (AU), Sant Longowal Institute of Engineering and Technology (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Model Reduction and Neural Networks
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.