Outcomes of patients with cervical spine metastasis treated with different surgical approaches—decision based on location

The low incidence of cervical metastases and complex anatomical structure of cervical spine complicate surgical strategy formulation and make it controversial. By summarizing and analyzing clinical data of patients with metastatic cervical spine tumors, this study aims to investigate treatment decisions of separation surgery and outcomes of different approaches to provide clinical evidence and references. For atlantoaxial metastases, occipitocervical fixation with decompression (OPFD) was performed. In cases involving lower cervical spine, anterior cervical corpectomy (ACCP) or posterior cervical fixation with decompression (PCFD) was performed. When both vertebral body and appendices were affected, the choice of approach was based on surgeons’ personal preference and patient’s specific condition. Baseline characteristics, clinical manifestations, surgical approach, perioperative complications, and postoperative outcomes, including neurological function, pain level, and survival were compared between the surgical approaches. The most common symptom was neck pain (116/124). Twenty-three patients underwent posterior OPFD, 47 patients underwent ACCP, and 42 patients underwent PCFD. There were no significant differences in perioperative complications, and postoperative therapy among patients with lower cervical metastases. For cases with simultaneous involvement of vertebral body and appendices, patients who underwent PCFD had significantly longer survival than those who underwent ACCP (29.4 ± 14.9 vs. 19.7 ± 12.5, p = 0.028). The same phenomenon was observed in other two comparisons. All patients experienced varying degrees of pain relief with those undergoing posterior approach demonstrating significantly greater pain relief (p < 0.05). No neurological deterioration was observed postoperatively. Perioperative complication rate was 26.6%. Multivariate Cox analysis showed that surgical approach was independent risk factors for survival. For patients with cervical metastases, we made treatment decisions based on the specific location of tumor and requirements of separation surgery to ensure that patients receive subsequent comprehensive therapy. The discernible differences between surgical approaches were that patients who underwent posterior approach tended to have more significant pain relief and longer survival.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
World Journal of Surgical Oncology
Published
2026-03-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-026-04289-4
Primary Topic
Management of metastatic bone disease
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Outcomes of patients with cervical spine metastasis treated with different surgical approaches—decision based on location

B Wang, Pan Hu, Hua Zhou, Ying Tang et al.
World Journal of Surgical Oncology
Management of metastatic bone disease
article

Outcomes of patients with cervical spine metastasis treated with different surgical approaches—decision based on location

B Wang, Pan Hu, Hua Zhou, Ying Tang, Jiasheng Chen, Fangzhi Liu, Zihe Li, Liang Liu, Yang Luo, Zhongjun Liu, Xiaoguang Liu, Feng Wei
article en

Abstract

The low incidence of cervical metastases and complex anatomical structure of cervical spine complicate surgical strategy formulation and make it controversial. By summarizing and analyzing clinical data of patients with metastatic cervical spine tumors, this study aims to investigate treatment decisions of separation surgery and outcomes of different approaches to provide clinical evidence and references. For atlantoaxial metastases, occipitocervical fixation with decompression (OPFD) was performed. In cases involving lower cervical spine, anterior cervical corpectomy (ACCP) or posterior cervical fixation with decompression (PCFD) was performed. When both vertebral body and appendices were affected, the choice of approach was based on surgeons’ personal preference and patient’s specific condition. Baseline characteristics, clinical manifestations, surgical approach, perioperative complications, and postoperative outcomes, including neurological function, pain level, and survival were compared between the surgical approaches. The most common symptom was neck pain (116/124). Twenty-three patients underwent posterior OPFD, 47 patients underwent ACCP, and 42 patients underwent PCFD. There were no significant differences in perioperative complications, and postoperative therapy among patients with lower cervical metastases. For cases with simultaneous involvement of vertebral body and appendices, patients who underwent PCFD had significantly longer survival than those who underwent ACCP (29.4 ± 14.9 vs. 19.7 ± 12.5, p = 0.028). The same phenomenon was observed in other two comparisons. All patients experienced varying degrees of pain relief with those undergoing posterior approach demonstrating significantly greater pain relief (p < 0.05). No neurological deterioration was observed postoperatively. Perioperative complication rate was 26.6%. Multivariate Cox analysis showed that surgical approach was independent risk factors for survival. For patients with cervical metastases, we made treatment decisions based on the specific location of tumor and requirements of separation surgery to ensure that patients receive subsequent comprehensive therapy. The discernible differences between surgical approaches were that patients who underwent posterior approach tended to have more significant pain relief and longer survival.

World Journal of Surgical Oncology
Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China (CN), Peking University (CN), Ministry of Education (SA), Spinal Research (GB), Peking University Third Hospital (CN), Central Hospital of Zibo (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Management of metastatic bone disease
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.