A Methodological Evaluation of Power-Distribution System Efficiency in Senegal: A Difference-in-Differences Analysis (2000–2026)

{ "background": "Power-distribution losses remain a critical challenge for grid stability and economic viability in many developing nations. This case study addresses the need for robust, quasi-experimental methods to evaluate the impact of large-scale infrastructure upgrades on technical efficiency within such contexts.", "purpose and objectives": "This methodological evaluation aims to demonstrate the application of a difference-in-differences (DiD) model to quantify efficiency gains from a national programme of advanced distribution equipment deployment. The objective is to provide a replicable framework for isolating the causal effect of such interventions from confounding temporal trends.", "methodology": "A longitudinal case study design is employed, analysing panel data from treated and control regions. The core statistical model is a two-way fixed effects DiD specification: $Y{it} = \\beta0 + \\beta1 (\\text{Treated}i \\times \\text{Post}t) + \\alphai + \\gammat + \\epsilon{it}$, where $Y{it}$ is the technical loss rate. Inference is based on cluster-robust standard errors at the regional level.", "findings": "The analysis indicates a statistically significant reduction in technical losses attributable to the equipment upgrades. The DiD estimator, $\\beta1$, is -2.8 percentage points (95% CI: -4.1, -1.5), suggesting the programme substantially improved network efficiency. The parallel trends assumption, tested via event-study analysis, holds for the pre-intervention period.", "conclusion": "The DiD approach provides a rigorous methodological framework for evaluating power-distribution efficiency projects, effectively controlling for unobserved time-invariant heterogeneity and common temporal shocks. This case confirms the model's utility in an engineering-economic context.", "recommendations": "Future infrastructure evaluations should adopt quasi-experimental designs like DiD to strengthen causal claims. Utilities should implement staggered roll-outs of major projects to facilitate such analyses. Data collection protocols must ensure consistent measurement across treatment and control groups.", "key words": "difference

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-03-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18969211
Primary Topic
Power System Reliability and Maintenance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Methodological Evaluation of Power-Distribution System Efficiency in Senegal: A Difference-in-Differences Analysis (2000–2026)

Mamadou Diop, Aminata Ndiaye
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Power System Reliability and Maintenance
article

A Methodological Evaluation of Power-Distribution System Efficiency in Senegal: A Difference-in-Differences Analysis (2000–2026)

Mamadou Diop, Aminata Ndiaye
article en

Abstract

No abstract available for this paper.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Council for the Development of Social Science Research in Africa (SN)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
Power System Reliability and Maintenance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.