Cariogenic potential of oral thickening agents in dysphagic patients

Dysphagia management in older adults often involves the use of oral thickening agents to modify the consistency of foods and liquids and thereby, reduce the risk of aspiration. Currently, there is limited evidence on the cariogenic potential of these agents and the consequences for oral health in elders. This pilot, comparative in-vivo study evaluated the cariogenicity of four commercially available thickening agents in water: Ensure Multi-thick, Thick & Easy, Thicken Up Clear, and Thicken Up Gel Express. The products were tested in three older adult volunteers (n = 8 tests; two replicates per product across four products) using intraoral plaque pH telemetry. Absolute cariogenicity (AC) was assessed via acidogenic potential (area under the pH-curve below 5.7), and relative cariogenicity (RC) was calculated relative to a 10 % glucose control rinse. One-way ANO-VA was used to compare mean AC and RC across products. All four products demonstrated measurable cariogenicity (AUC < 5.7). Mean AC ranged from 13.70 (Thick & Easy) to 21.62 (Thicken Up Gel Express). Thicken Up Clear and Thicken Up Gel Express showed narrow standard deviations (SD = 0.09 and 0.49, respectively); Ensure Multi-thick showed high variability (SD = 21.02). RC values were highest for Thicken Up Gel Express (0.81 ± 0.15), then Thicken Up Clear (0.68 ± 0.08), and lower for Ensure Multi-thick (0.42 ± 0.42) and Thick & Easy (0.43 ± 0.36). The ANOVA revealed no statistically significant differences among products (P > 0.05). Within the limitations of this pilot study, all tested thickening agents showed moderate relative cariogenicity that may be clinically relevant in older adults with existing caries risk factors. These preliminary findings suggest that product selection and preventive oral care strategies are important when thickening agents are used for dysphagia management. Further analyses with larger samples and in vivo clinical outcomes are needed to confirm and extend these results.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SWISS DENTAL JOURNAL SSO – Science and Clinical Topics
Published
2026-03-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.61872/sdj-2026-01-05
Primary Topic
Dysphagia Assessment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cariogenic potential of oral thickening agents in dysphagic patients

Angela Stillhart, Florian Just Wegehaupt, Andrea Gubler, Marina Zollinger et al.
SWISS DENTAL JOURNAL SSO – Science and Clinical Topics
Dysphagia Assessment and Management
article

Cariogenic potential of oral thickening agents in dysphagic patients

Angela Stillhart, Florian Just Wegehaupt, Andrea Gubler, Marina Zollinger, Murali Srinivasan, Thomas Attin
article en

Abstract

Dysphagia management in older adults often involves the use of oral thickening agents to modify the consistency of foods and liquids and thereby, reduce the risk of aspiration. Currently, there is limited evidence on the cariogenic potential of these agents and the consequences for oral health in elders. This pilot, comparative in-vivo study evaluated the cariogenicity of four commercially available thickening agents in water: Ensure Multi-thick, Thick & Easy, Thicken Up Clear, and Thicken Up Gel Express. The products were tested in three older adult volunteers (n = 8 tests; two replicates per product across four products) using intraoral plaque pH telemetry. Absolute cariogenicity (AC) was assessed via acidogenic potential (area under the pH-curve below 5.7), and relative cariogenicity (RC) was calculated relative to a 10 % glucose control rinse. One-way ANO-VA was used to compare mean AC and RC across products. All four products demonstrated measurable cariogenicity (AUC < 5.7). Mean AC ranged from 13.70 (Thick & Easy) to 21.62 (Thicken Up Gel Express). Thicken Up Clear and Thicken Up Gel Express showed narrow standard deviations (SD = 0.09 and 0.49, respectively); Ensure Multi-thick showed high variability (SD = 21.02). RC values were highest for Thicken Up Gel Express (0.81 ± 0.15), then Thicken Up Clear (0.68 ± 0.08), and lower for Ensure Multi-thick (0.42 ± 0.42) and Thick & Easy (0.43 ± 0.36). The ANOVA revealed no statistically significant differences among products (P > 0.05). Within the limitations of this pilot study, all tested thickening agents showed moderate relative cariogenicity that may be clinically relevant in older adults with existing caries risk factors. These preliminary findings suggest that product selection and preventive oral care strategies are important when thickening agents are used for dysphagia management. Further analyses with larger samples and in vivo clinical outcomes are needed to confirm and extend these results.

SWISS DENTAL JOURNAL SSO – Science and Clinical TopicsVol. 136(01)
University of Zurich (CH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Dysphagia Assessment and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.