From Single-Nozzle to Multi-Nozzle Electrospinning: A Comparative Manufacturability Perspective on 3D Electrospun Structures

Abstract Electrospinning has evolved from producing two-dimensional nanofiber mats to forming three-dimensional electrospun (3D ES) structures with improved mechanical integrity and functional performance. However, scalable and controllable fabrication of 3D ES structures remains challenging. This review provides a quantitative and mechanism-oriented comparison of major fabrication strategies, including single-nozzle electrospinning (SN), electric field manipulation (EFM), mold-based methods (MBM), near-field electrospinning (NF), hybrid electrospinning–3D printing methods (HBM), controlled deposition systems (CDM), and multi-nozzle electrospinning (MN). Reported operating parameters span applied voltages from 0.1 to 65 kV, working distances from 0.1 to 385 mm, and material delivery rates from 0.006 to 96 mL/h. SN-based and mold-assisted approaches demonstrate the feasibility of forming 3D ES structures under single-jet conditions and low flow rates (typically < 7 mL/h), but their scalability is inherently limited. NF achieves high positional accuracy at short working distances (≤ 80 mm) and low voltages (≤ 8 kV), though its narrow process window restricts large-area fabrication. In contrast, MN electrospinning enables the highest throughput, with nozzle counts ranging from 2 to 72 and fiber diameters as small as 66 nm. Importantly, successful 3D structure formation using single-nozzle configurations confirms that the fundamental electrohydrodynamic mechanisms for three-dimensional growth already exist, implying that MN systems operating at higher throughput possess greater potential for scalable 3D ES fabrication. Despite this, MN performance remains highly sensitive to inter-nozzle spacing, electric-field uniformity, and jet–jet electrostatic interactions, which continue to limit deposition uniformity and mechanical robustness.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing
Published
2026-03-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-026-01460-5
Primary Topic
Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From Single-Nozzle to Multi-Nozzle Electrospinning: A Comparative Manufacturability Perspective on 3D Electrospun Structures

Mohd Ridha Muhamad, Edzrol Niza Mohamad, Zuradzman Bin Mohamad Razlan, Somanaathan Muthusamy
International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing
Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications
article

From Single-Nozzle to Multi-Nozzle Electrospinning: A Comparative Manufacturability Perspective on 3D Electrospun Structures

Mohd Ridha Muhamad, Edzrol Niza Mohamad, Zuradzman Bin Mohamad Razlan, Somanaathan Muthusamy
article en

Abstract

Abstract Electrospinning has evolved from producing two-dimensional nanofiber mats to forming three-dimensional electrospun (3D ES) structures with improved mechanical integrity and functional performance. However, scalable and controllable fabrication of 3D ES structures remains challenging. This review provides a quantitative and mechanism-oriented comparison of major fabrication strategies, including single-nozzle electrospinning (SN), electric field manipulation (EFM), mold-based methods (MBM), near-field electrospinning (NF), hybrid electrospinning–3D printing methods (HBM), controlled deposition systems (CDM), and multi-nozzle electrospinning (MN). Reported operating parameters span applied voltages from 0.1 to 65 kV, working distances from 0.1 to 385 mm, and material delivery rates from 0.006 to 96 mL/h. SN-based and mold-assisted approaches demonstrate the feasibility of forming 3D ES structures under single-jet conditions and low flow rates (typically < 7 mL/h), but their scalability is inherently limited. NF achieves high positional accuracy at short working distances (≤ 80 mm) and low voltages (≤ 8 kV), though its narrow process window restricts large-area fabrication. In contrast, MN electrospinning enables the highest throughput, with nozzle counts ranging from 2 to 72 and fiber diameters as small as 66 nm. Importantly, successful 3D structure formation using single-nozzle configurations confirms that the fundamental electrohydrodynamic mechanisms for three-dimensional growth already exist, implying that MN systems operating at higher throughput possess greater potential for scalable 3D ES fabrication. Despite this, MN performance remains highly sensitive to inter-nozzle spacing, electric-field uniformity, and jet–jet electrostatic interactions, which continue to limit deposition uniformity and mechanical robustness.

International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing
University Malaya Medical Centre (MY), University of Malaya (MY), Universiti Malaysia Perlis (MY)
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.