Impact of Medicaid Enrollment Timing on Tumor Stage at Diagnosis and Survival in Breast, Colorectal, and Lung Cancer

<b>Background:</b> Medicaid-insured patients experience higher rates of late-stage cancer diagnosis and worse survival than non-Medicaid patients. The impact of Medicaid enrollment timing on cancer outcomes is less clear. This study examines the association between Medicaid enrollment and timing with tumor stage and cancer-specific survival for breast, colorectal, and lung cancers. <b>Methods:</b> We analyzed SEER-Medicaid linked data for 276,755 breast, 104,784 colorectal, and 101,058 lung cancer patients < 65 years of age. Patients were categorized as non-Medicaid enrollees, pre-diagnosis enrollees (≥12 months before), or post-diagnosis enrollees (≤12 months after). Multivariable logistic regression estimated odds ratios of late-stage diagnosis, and cause-specific Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess cancer-specific survival, adjusting for demographic and socioeconomic factors. <b>Results:</b> Compared to non-Medicaid enrollees, post-diagnosis enrollees had the highest odds of late-stage diagnosis (breast cancer: OR: 3.41; colorectal cancer: OR: 3.78; lung cancer: OR: 1.87). Pre-diagnosis enrollees also had increased odds, but the association was weaker than post-diagnosis enrollees. Cancer-specific mortality was higher for both pre- and post-diagnosis enrollees compared to non-Medicaid enrollees for each cancer examined across tumor stage at diagnosis. Among Medicaid enrollees, those enrolled post-diagnosis had higher cancer-specific mortality than those enrolled pre-diagnosis for localized-stage colorectal (HR: 1.82) and lung cancer (HR: 1.30). In contrast, those enrolled post-diagnosis had lower mortality than those enrolled pre diagnosis for distant-stage breast cancer (HR: 0.91). <b>Conclusions:</b> Compared with cancer patients not insured by Medicaid, post-diagnosis Medicaid enrollment was associated with a greater likelihood of late-stage cancer and worse cancer-specific survival across each cancer type examined. Future research is warranted to examine the role of Medicaid enrollment timing in cancer care to better understand its impact on cancer outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Healthcare
Published
2026-03-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare14060713
Primary Topic
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of Medicaid Enrollment Timing on Tumor Stage at Diagnosis and Survival in Breast, Colorectal, and Lung Cancer

Stella Self, Gabriel A. Benavidez, Jan M. Eberth, Janice Probst et al.
Healthcare
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
article

Impact of Medicaid Enrollment Timing on Tumor Stage at Diagnosis and Survival in Breast, Colorectal, and Lung Cancer

Stella Self, Gabriel A. Benavidez, Jan M. Eberth, Janice Probst, Anthony J. Alberg
article en

Abstract

<b>Background:</b> Medicaid-insured patients experience higher rates of late-stage cancer diagnosis and worse survival than non-Medicaid patients. The impact of Medicaid enrollment timing on cancer outcomes is less clear. This study examines the association between Medicaid enrollment and timing with tumor stage and cancer-specific survival for breast, colorectal, and lung cancers. <b>Methods:</b> We analyzed SEER-Medicaid linked data for 276,755 breast, 104,784 colorectal, and 101,058 lung cancer patients < 65 years of age. Patients were categorized as non-Medicaid enrollees, pre-diagnosis enrollees (≥12 months before), or post-diagnosis enrollees (≤12 months after). Multivariable logistic regression estimated odds ratios of late-stage diagnosis, and cause-specific Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess cancer-specific survival, adjusting for demographic and socioeconomic factors. <b>Results:</b> Compared to non-Medicaid enrollees, post-diagnosis enrollees had the highest odds of late-stage diagnosis (breast cancer: OR: 3.41; colorectal cancer: OR: 3.78; lung cancer: OR: 1.87). Pre-diagnosis enrollees also had increased odds, but the association was weaker than post-diagnosis enrollees. Cancer-specific mortality was higher for both pre- and post-diagnosis enrollees compared to non-Medicaid enrollees for each cancer examined across tumor stage at diagnosis. Among Medicaid enrollees, those enrolled post-diagnosis had higher cancer-specific mortality than those enrolled pre-diagnosis for localized-stage colorectal (HR: 1.82) and lung cancer (HR: 1.30). In contrast, those enrolled post-diagnosis had lower mortality than those enrolled pre diagnosis for distant-stage breast cancer (HR: 0.91). <b>Conclusions:</b> Compared with cancer patients not insured by Medicaid, post-diagnosis Medicaid enrollment was associated with a greater likelihood of late-stage cancer and worse cancer-specific survival across each cancer type examined. Future research is warranted to examine the role of Medicaid enrollment timing in cancer care to better understand its impact on cancer outcomes.

HealthcareVol. 14(6)
University of South Carolina (US), Baylor University (US), Virginia–Maryland College of Veterinary Medicine (US), Virginia Tech (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.