Understanding landowners' preferences to participate in tropical mountain forest restoration

Abstract Introduction The restoration of degraded tropical forests is a promising strategy to mitigate the climate and biodiversity crises. Across the globe large areas have the potential to be restored through multiplying small‐scale initiatives implemented by landowners working at local scales. Understanding landowners' preferences related to the attributes of forest restoration could aid to scale‐up the outcomes of restoration. Objectives Our goal was to elicit the preferences of landowners working with forest restoration in the Tropical Andes of Ecuador and to evaluate how environmental and socioeconomic factors influence their choices. Methods We used a choice experiment approach to elicit landowners' preferences regarding forest restoration. We presented a hypothetical forest restoration program to 81 landowners in which coordination among stakeholders is important to diversify plant communities across restored sites. We assessed four attributes of forest restoration: (1) restoration strategy, (2) land share, (3) the coordination instance, and (4) monetary compensation. Results We found that if the proposed forest restoration program is focused on habitat enrichment and coordinated either by NGOs, farmers, or scientists, landowners will be more willing to participate than in a program led by the government and focused on nucleation. The probabilities of landowners to join the proposed program declined with elevation, while the probabilities of opt‐out declined with the size of non‐forest productive land within farms. Conclusions Trust in non‐governmental stakeholders can be harnessed to support government‐led initiatives, which have the capacity to drive large‐scale interventions. Environmental and socioeconomic factors, influence decision‐making in forest restoration.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Restoration Ecology
Published
2026-03-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.70368
Primary Topic
Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Understanding landowners' preferences to participate in tropical mountain forest restoration

Nina Farwig, Maritza Satama‐Bermeo, Roland Olschewski, Esteban A. Guevara et al.
Restoration Ecology
Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
article

Understanding landowners' preferences to participate in tropical mountain forest restoration

Nina Farwig, Maritza Satama‐Bermeo, Roland Olschewski, Esteban A. Guevara, Tatiana Santander, Leonardo Quinteros
article en

Abstract

Abstract Introduction The restoration of degraded tropical forests is a promising strategy to mitigate the climate and biodiversity crises. Across the globe large areas have the potential to be restored through multiplying small‐scale initiatives implemented by landowners working at local scales. Understanding landowners' preferences related to the attributes of forest restoration could aid to scale‐up the outcomes of restoration. Objectives Our goal was to elicit the preferences of landowners working with forest restoration in the Tropical Andes of Ecuador and to evaluate how environmental and socioeconomic factors influence their choices. Methods We used a choice experiment approach to elicit landowners' preferences regarding forest restoration. We presented a hypothetical forest restoration program to 81 landowners in which coordination among stakeholders is important to diversify plant communities across restored sites. We assessed four attributes of forest restoration: (1) restoration strategy, (2) land share, (3) the coordination instance, and (4) monetary compensation. Results We found that if the proposed forest restoration program is focused on habitat enrichment and coordinated either by NGOs, farmers, or scientists, landowners will be more willing to participate than in a program led by the government and focused on nucleation. The probabilities of landowners to join the proposed program declined with elevation, while the probabilities of opt‐out declined with the size of non‐forest productive land within farms. Conclusions Trust in non‐governmental stakeholders can be harnessed to support government‐led initiatives, which have the capacity to drive large‐scale interventions. Environmental and socioeconomic factors, influence decision‐making in forest restoration.

Restoration Ecology
Philipps University of Marburg (DE), Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research (CH), Universidad de Las Américas (EC), Instituto Nacional de Biodiversidad (EC)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 39%
Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.