Monotone delta: an order-theoretic tournament graph approach for internal consistency assessment

This paper introduces Monotone Delta (δ), an order-theoretic measure for assessing the internal consistency of survey-based instruments. Classical coefficients such as Cronbach's Alpha and McDonald's Omega can yield misleading estimates under practical violations, including redundancy, multidimensional constructs, and correlated errors. Monotone Delta avoids parametric and factor-model assumptions by quantifying internal consistency through contradiction minimization with a weighted tournament formulation, aligning responses to an optimal unidimensional latent order. In controlled synthetic studies across four scenarios (tau-equivalence, redundancy, multidimensionality, and non-normal/correlated errors), Monotone Delta stays closest to the theoretical reliability, with absolute error ≤ 0.02 in the challenging scenarios where Alpha and Omega deviate by as much as 0.22 and 0.14, respectively. On a 350-participant human study for AI-generated image assessment, Monotone Delta agrees with Alpha/Omega under near-ideal conditions (overall δ = 0.91 vs. α = 0.92, ω = 0.94) while remaining stable under redundancy and non-normal perturbations (overall δ = 0.84 and δ = 0.81, respectively, where Alpha drops to 0.95 and 0.35). These results position Monotone Delta as a practical alternative for reliability assessment in socio-technical systems, human factors, healthcare, and interactive system design.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Applied Mathematics and Statistics
Published
2026-03-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fams.2025.1687194
Primary Topic
Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Monotone delta: an order-theoretic tournament graph approach for internal consistency assessment

Umair Rehman, Katarina Grolinger, Muhammad Umair Danish
Frontiers in Applied Mathematics and Statistics
Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
article

Monotone delta: an order-theoretic tournament graph approach for internal consistency assessment

Umair Rehman, Katarina Grolinger, Muhammad Umair Danish
article en

Abstract

This paper introduces Monotone Delta (δ), an order-theoretic measure for assessing the internal consistency of survey-based instruments. Classical coefficients such as Cronbach's Alpha and McDonald's Omega can yield misleading estimates under practical violations, including redundancy, multidimensional constructs, and correlated errors. Monotone Delta avoids parametric and factor-model assumptions by quantifying internal consistency through contradiction minimization with a weighted tournament formulation, aligning responses to an optimal unidimensional latent order. In controlled synthetic studies across four scenarios (tau-equivalence, redundancy, multidimensionality, and non-normal/correlated errors), Monotone Delta stays closest to the theoretical reliability, with absolute error ≤ 0.02 in the challenging scenarios where Alpha and Omega deviate by as much as 0.22 and 0.14, respectively. On a 350-participant human study for AI-generated image assessment, Monotone Delta agrees with Alpha/Omega under near-ideal conditions (overall δ = 0.91 vs. α = 0.92, ω = 0.94) while remaining stable under redundancy and non-normal perturbations (overall δ = 0.84 and δ = 0.81, respectively, where Alpha drops to 0.95 and 0.35). These results position Monotone Delta as a practical alternative for reliability assessment in socio-technical systems, human factors, healthcare, and interactive system design.

Frontiers in Applied Mathematics and StatisticsVol. 12
Western University (CA)
Canada Research Chairs, Environment and Climate Change Canada
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.