Motor imagery perspective shapes corticospinal excitability with effector-specific effects

Motor imagery (MI) allows individuals to mentally simulate movements without execution, engaging neural pathways that overlap with those used during real actions. However, how imagery perspective influences corticospinal excitability across different effectors remains unclear. Using neuronavigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), we compared kinesthetic (KMI), first-person visual (VMI-1PP), and third-person visual (VMI-3PP) imagery of elbow flexion-extension in nineteen healthy adults. Single-pulse TMS was synchronized with a metronome marking the imagined peak contraction, and motor-evoked potentials were recorded from upper-arm and intrinsic hand muscles. All imagery types enhanced corticospinal excitability relative to a pacing-only baseline. For upper-arm muscles, VMI-3PP and KMI produced stronger facilitation than VMI-1PP, with no difference between KMI and VMI-3PP. In contrast, intrinsic hand muscles showed similar facilitation across all imagery types. These findings reveal that imagery perspective and effector interact to shape corticospinal output: proximal muscles are more sensitive to perspective, whereas distal muscles respond uniformly. The observation that third-person visual imagery can match kinesthetic imagery in enhancing corticospinal excitability highlights its potential as a practical and effective strategy for training and neurorehabilitation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-03-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-42691-w
Primary Topic
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Motor imagery perspective shapes corticospinal excitability with effector-specific effects

Oleg Shevtsov, Victoria Moiseeva, Gleb Perevoznyuk, Artyom A. Batov et al.
Scientific Reports
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
article

Motor imagery perspective shapes corticospinal excitability with effector-specific effects

Oleg Shevtsov, Victoria Moiseeva, Gleb Perevoznyuk, Artyom A. Batov, Matteo Feurra, Aleksandra S. Pleskovskaya, Daria Ponomareva, Aynur A. Ragimova, Anthony Mensah
article en

Abstract

Motor imagery (MI) allows individuals to mentally simulate movements without execution, engaging neural pathways that overlap with those used during real actions. However, how imagery perspective influences corticospinal excitability across different effectors remains unclear. Using neuronavigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), we compared kinesthetic (KMI), first-person visual (VMI-1PP), and third-person visual (VMI-3PP) imagery of elbow flexion-extension in nineteen healthy adults. Single-pulse TMS was synchronized with a metronome marking the imagined peak contraction, and motor-evoked potentials were recorded from upper-arm and intrinsic hand muscles. All imagery types enhanced corticospinal excitability relative to a pacing-only baseline. For upper-arm muscles, VMI-3PP and KMI produced stronger facilitation than VMI-1PP, with no difference between KMI and VMI-3PP. In contrast, intrinsic hand muscles showed similar facilitation across all imagery types. These findings reveal that imagery perspective and effector interact to shape corticospinal output: proximal muscles are more sensitive to perspective, whereas distal muscles respond uniformly. The observation that third-person visual imagery can match kinesthetic imagery in enhancing corticospinal excitability highlights its potential as a practical and effective strategy for training and neurorehabilitation.

Scientific Reports
National Research University Higher School of Economics (RU), Institut des Sciences Cognitives Marc Jeannerod (FR), Research Center of Neurology (RU)
National Research University Higher School of Economics
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.