History of Trauma Preceding Cervical Disc Replacement Leads to Worse Postoperative Patient Reported Outcomes: A Matched Cohort Analysis

Study DesignSingle-center retrospective cohort study.ObjectivesTo investigate whether a history of minor cervical trauma is associated with worse postoperative outcomes following CDR.MethodsPatients who underwent primary one- or two-level CDR from 2017 to 2023 by multiple surgeons at a single institution were included. Minor cervical trauma was defined as an event likely to affect the cervical spine but not requiring immediate surgical intervention. Trauma patients were matched 1:3 to controls based on age, sex, number of operated levels, and surgeon. PROMs at early (2-12 weeks) and late (6-24 months) timepoints, along with perioperative variables, were compared.ResultsOf 308 CDR patients, 43 had a history of minor cervical trauma. After matching, the trauma (n = 43) and non-trauma (n = 129) cohorts were demographically similar. The trauma group had significantly worse NDI (early: 33.6 vs. 22.5, <i>P</i> = .005; late: 28.4 vs. 19.1, <i>P</i> = .023), SF-12 PCS, SF-12 MCS, and PROMIS-PF scores. No differences were found in operative time, blood loss, length of stay, or complication rates.ConclusionsMinor cervical trauma is associated with significantly worse postoperative disability and physical function following CDR, despite similar perioperative courses and complication rates.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Global Spine Journal
Published
2026-03-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682261426939
Primary Topic
Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

History of Trauma Preceding Cervical Disc Replacement Leads to Worse Postoperative Patient Reported Outcomes: A Matched Cohort Analysis

Kyle W. Morse, Ali Bay, Tomoyuki Asada, A. T. Y. Lui et al.
Global Spine Journal
Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy
article

History of Trauma Preceding Cervical Disc Replacement Leads to Worse Postoperative Patient Reported Outcomes: A Matched Cohort Analysis

Kyle W. Morse, Ali Bay, Tomoyuki Asada, A. T. Y. Lui, James Dowdell, Atahan Durbas, Andrea Pezzi, Olivia Tuma, Anthony Lewis, Sereen Halayqeh, Cole Kwas, Sravisht Iyer, Jack D. Farmer, Nicholas Giattino, Eric Mai, Han Jo Kim, Chad Z. Simon, Sheeraz A. Qureshi, Russel C. Huang, Todd J. Albert
article en

Abstract

Study DesignSingle-center retrospective cohort study.ObjectivesTo investigate whether a history of minor cervical trauma is associated with worse postoperative outcomes following CDR.MethodsPatients who underwent primary one- or two-level CDR from 2017 to 2023 by multiple surgeons at a single institution were included. Minor cervical trauma was defined as an event likely to affect the cervical spine but not requiring immediate surgical intervention. Trauma patients were matched 1:3 to controls based on age, sex, number of operated levels, and surgeon. PROMs at early (2-12 weeks) and late (6-24 months) timepoints, along with perioperative variables, were compared.ResultsOf 308 CDR patients, 43 had a history of minor cervical trauma. After matching, the trauma (n = 43) and non-trauma (n = 129) cohorts were demographically similar. The trauma group had significantly worse NDI (early: 33.6 vs. 22.5, <i>P</i> = .005; late: 28.4 vs. 19.1, <i>P</i> = .023), SF-12 PCS, SF-12 MCS, and PROMIS-PF scores. No differences were found in operative time, blood loss, length of stay, or complication rates.ConclusionsMinor cervical trauma is associated with significantly worse postoperative disability and physical function following CDR, despite similar perioperative courses and complication rates.

Global Spine Journal
Hospital for Special Surgery (US)
National Institutes of Health, Weill Cornell Medical College
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.