Predicting fracture risk after non-recent high risk fracture: improving accuracy with simple modifiers to FRAX

Prior fracture is among the strongest predictors of future osteoporotic fracture. However, the Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX®) incorporates it as a dichotomous variable, potentially obscuring important heterogeneity related to fracture site and multiplicity. Although recent (≤2-year) fractures are recognized as conferring imminent risk, it is unclear whether non-recent high-risk fractures (nrHRFs)-specifically hip, vertebral, or multiple fractures-continue to elevate long-term risk beyond that captured by standard FRAX inputs. In this population-based retrospective cohort study using the Manitoba Bone Mineral Density Registry linked to comprehensive provincial administrative health data, adults ≥40 years undergoing first DXA between 1996-2018 were included (N=88,653). Individuals who had a prior recent fracture (occurring less than 2 years prior to the index date) were excluded. Prior non-recent fractures (>2 years pre-index) were identified. Ten-year major osteoporotic fracture (MOF) and hip fracture probabilities were calculated using Canadian FRAX. Using Cox models adjusted for baseline FRAX probability, we evaluated residual risk associated with nrHRFs. A 2:1 train-test split was used to derive and internally validate recalibration multipliers based on observed-to-predicted fracture ratios incorporating competing risk of death. FRAX stratified fracture risk better in those without prior nrHRF compared to those with nrHRF. In the derivation cohort, despite including prior fracture as a FRAX input, observed-to-predicted ratios indicated underestimation of MOF risk for non-recent vertebral (1.32) and multiple fractures (1.34), and underestimation of hip fracture risk for non-recent multiple fractures (1.70). Derived multipliers (×1.3 for MOF; ×1.7 for hip fracture) demonstrated good calibration in the validation cohort. Applying adjustments reclassified 13.3% and 3.5% of individuals with prior nrHRFs into high-risk MOF and hip fracture categories, respectively. FRAX underestimates 10-year fracture risk in individuals with specific nrHRFs. Simple adjustment factors markedly improve calibration and enhance identification of patients who may benefit from fracture-preventive therapy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Bone and Mineral Research
Published
2026-03-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jbmr/zjag049
Primary Topic
Bone health and osteoporosis research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Predicting fracture risk after non-recent high risk fracture: improving accuracy with simple modifiers to FRAX

E. McCloskey, S. Morin, Lisa Marie Lix, Carrie Ye et al.
Journal of Bone and Mineral Research
Bone health and osteoporosis research
article

Predicting fracture risk after non-recent high risk fracture: improving accuracy with simple modifiers to FRAX

E. McCloskey, S. Morin, Lisa Marie Lix, Carrie Ye, John A Kanis, Helena Johansson, Nicholas C Harvey, William D Leslie3
article en

Abstract

Prior fracture is among the strongest predictors of future osteoporotic fracture. However, the Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX®) incorporates it as a dichotomous variable, potentially obscuring important heterogeneity related to fracture site and multiplicity. Although recent (≤2-year) fractures are recognized as conferring imminent risk, it is unclear whether non-recent high-risk fractures (nrHRFs)-specifically hip, vertebral, or multiple fractures-continue to elevate long-term risk beyond that captured by standard FRAX inputs. In this population-based retrospective cohort study using the Manitoba Bone Mineral Density Registry linked to comprehensive provincial administrative health data, adults ≥40 years undergoing first DXA between 1996-2018 were included (N=88,653). Individuals who had a prior recent fracture (occurring less than 2 years prior to the index date) were excluded. Prior non-recent fractures (>2 years pre-index) were identified. Ten-year major osteoporotic fracture (MOF) and hip fracture probabilities were calculated using Canadian FRAX. Using Cox models adjusted for baseline FRAX probability, we evaluated residual risk associated with nrHRFs. A 2:1 train-test split was used to derive and internally validate recalibration multipliers based on observed-to-predicted fracture ratios incorporating competing risk of death. FRAX stratified fracture risk better in those without prior nrHRF compared to those with nrHRF. In the derivation cohort, despite including prior fracture as a FRAX input, observed-to-predicted ratios indicated underestimation of MOF risk for non-recent vertebral (1.32) and multiple fractures (1.34), and underestimation of hip fracture risk for non-recent multiple fractures (1.70). Derived multipliers (×1.3 for MOF; ×1.7 for hip fracture) demonstrated good calibration in the validation cohort. Applying adjustments reclassified 13.3% and 3.5% of individuals with prior nrHRFs into high-risk MOF and hip fracture categories, respectively. FRAX underestimates 10-year fracture risk in individuals with specific nrHRFs. Simple adjustment factors markedly improve calibration and enhance identification of patients who may benefit from fracture-preventive therapy.

Journal of Bone and Mineral Research
University of Alberta (CA), Sahlgrenska University Hospital (SE), University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Arthritis UK (GB), NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre (GB), MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit (GB), University of Southampton (GB), University of Manitoba (CA), McGill University (CA), Monash University (AU), University of Gothenburg (SE), University of Sheffield (GB)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Bone health and osteoporosis research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.