Investigating the Relationship Between Explicit and Implicit Anger Attitudes Using the Anger Implicit Association Test and Anger Gauge Test-Trait/State 5

Given the established divergence between reflective self-reports and automatic attitudes in emotional contexts, the study investigated the relationship between explicit and implicit anger attitudes. Explicit anger was multidimensionally assessed via the ANG-TS5, encompassing ‘State Anger,’ ‘Trait Anger,’ ‘Anger Sensitivity,’ and ‘Anger Attribution,’ while implicit anger was evaluated by using the Anger Implicit Association Test (AIAT). Preliminary bivariate analyses indicated a non-significant relationship between the two measures. However, a supplementary analysis of task performance revealed that age significantly distorted reaction latencies, particularly under incompatible conditions. After statistically isolating this confounding influence of age, the analysis revealed a significant inverse relationship between explicit and implicit anger. This association was primarily driven by Anger Sensitivity, suggesting that individuals with heightened awareness of anger’s detrimental consequences possess a more robust automatic pairing of anger with negative valence. The findings of this study provide a profound understanding of anger and offer critical implications for future research concerning the persistence, evaluation, and therapeutic intervention of anger-related constructs.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Korean Data Analysis Society
Published
2026-02-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.37727/jkdas.2026.28.1.17
Primary Topic
Personality Traits and Psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Investigating the Relationship Between Explicit and Implicit Anger Attitudes Using the Anger Implicit Association Test and Anger Gauge Test-Trait/State 5

Jeongeun Han, Jang-Han Lee
The Korean Data Analysis Society
Personality Traits and Psychology
article

Investigating the Relationship Between Explicit and Implicit Anger Attitudes Using the Anger Implicit Association Test and Anger Gauge Test-Trait/State 5

Jeongeun Han, Jang-Han Lee
article en

Abstract

Given the established divergence between reflective self-reports and automatic attitudes in emotional contexts, the study investigated the relationship between explicit and implicit anger attitudes. Explicit anger was multidimensionally assessed via the ANG-TS5, encompassing ‘State Anger,’ ‘Trait Anger,’ ‘Anger Sensitivity,’ and ‘Anger Attribution,’ while implicit anger was evaluated by using the Anger Implicit Association Test (AIAT). Preliminary bivariate analyses indicated a non-significant relationship between the two measures. However, a supplementary analysis of task performance revealed that age significantly distorted reaction latencies, particularly under incompatible conditions. After statistically isolating this confounding influence of age, the analysis revealed a significant inverse relationship between explicit and implicit anger. This association was primarily driven by Anger Sensitivity, suggesting that individuals with heightened awareness of anger’s detrimental consequences possess a more robust automatic pairing of anger with negative valence. The findings of this study provide a profound understanding of anger and offer critical implications for future research concerning the persistence, evaluation, and therapeutic intervention of anger-related constructs.

The Korean Data Analysis SocietyVol. 28(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Personality Traits and Psychology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.