Implicit and Explicit Voice Training Effects on Speech-on-Speech Perception and Listening Effort

Results from the present study demonstrated that both implicit and explicit voice training might lead to a reduction in listening effort, even in the absence of a speech intelligibility benefit. Overall, listening to voices that were explicitly trained seemed to be less effortful than listening to implicitly trained voices. Nevertheless, implicit voice training might be more beneficial in improving speech intelligibility performance for more favorable TMRs. Therefore, both implicit and explicit voice training might provide differential benefits for speech-on-speech perception. Nevertheless, voice training effects reported in the present study can reflect a combination of stimulus-specific perceptual learning and voice familiarity, as the same stimuli were used during training and testing, with generalization to novel utterances left for future studies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ear and Hearing
Published
2026-03-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/aud.0000000000001805
Primary Topic
Phonetics and Phonology Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Implicit and Explicit Voice Training Effects on Speech-on-Speech Perception and Listening Effort

Deniz Başkent, Thomas Koelewijn, Ada Biçer, Carolyn McGettigan
Ear and Hearing
Phonetics and Phonology Research
article

Implicit and Explicit Voice Training Effects on Speech-on-Speech Perception and Listening Effort

Deniz Başkent, Thomas Koelewijn, Ada Biçer, Carolyn McGettigan
article en

Abstract

Results from the present study demonstrated that both implicit and explicit voice training might lead to a reduction in listening effort, even in the absence of a speech intelligibility benefit. Overall, listening to voices that were explicitly trained seemed to be less effortful than listening to implicitly trained voices. Nevertheless, implicit voice training might be more beneficial in improving speech intelligibility performance for more favorable TMRs. Therefore, both implicit and explicit voice training might provide differential benefits for speech-on-speech perception. Nevertheless, voice training effects reported in the present study can reflect a combination of stimulus-specific perceptual learning and voice familiarity, as the same stimuli were used during training and testing, with generalization to novel utterances left for future studies.

Ear and Hearing
University Medical Center Groningen (NL), University of Groningen (NL), Language Science (South Korea) (KR), University College London (GB)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Phonetics and Phonology Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Implicit and Explicit Voice Training Effects on Speech-on-Speech Perception and Listening Effort — Deniz Başkent, Thomas Koelewijn, et al. · Ear and Hearing (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS