Cranial Nerve Injury in Endoscopic Endonasal Approach to Skull Base Surgery: A Systematic Review

The endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) to the skull base has revolutionized the management of ventral skull base lesions, offering superior visualization and reduced morbidity. Yet, iatrogenic cranial nerve (CN) injuries, causing temporary or permanent deficits, remain an underexplored complication that significantly affects quality of life. This systematic review describes the number of reported cases of CN injuries in EEA and the evidence on prevention and management strategies. Following PRISMA-SR guidelines, we searched Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library, and screened 2796 studies; 177 were included. Across 18,546 patients, 859 CN injuries were reported. The abducens (24.4%), optic (23.7%), and olfactory (18.6%) nerves were most affected, linked primarily to pituitary adenomas (34.49%) and sellar approaches (34.4%). Full recovery occurred in 38.4% of cases, while 29.9% had permanent deficits. Intraoperative neuromonitoring was reported in 34 studies, showing prognostic value but lacking definitive evidence for injury prevention. Only 5% of studies addressed postoperative management, highlighting a care gap. This review emphasizes the need for standardized reporting, enhanced monitoring, and robust postoperative strategies to optimize EEA outcomes. Future directions include prospective studies and patient-reported outcomes to refine skull base surgery safety.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology
Published
2026-03-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alr.70134
Primary Topic
Head and Neck Surgical Oncology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cranial Nerve Injury in Endoscopic Endonasal Approach to Skull Base Surgery: A Systematic Review

Jihad Abdelgadir, Tanner J. Zachem, Anthony Ghanem, Sarah E. Cantrell et al.
International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology
Head and Neck Surgical Oncology
article

Cranial Nerve Injury in Endoscopic Endonasal Approach to Skull Base Surgery: A Systematic Review

Jihad Abdelgadir, Tanner J. Zachem, Anthony Ghanem, Sarah E. Cantrell, Ali R. Zomorodi, Alexandra E. Hunter, Adam Kaakati, David W. Jang, Patrick J. Codd, Jordan Komisarow, Mohamed‐Yahia Monawar, Ralph Abi Hachem
article en

Abstract

The endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) to the skull base has revolutionized the management of ventral skull base lesions, offering superior visualization and reduced morbidity. Yet, iatrogenic cranial nerve (CN) injuries, causing temporary or permanent deficits, remain an underexplored complication that significantly affects quality of life. This systematic review describes the number of reported cases of CN injuries in EEA and the evidence on prevention and management strategies. Following PRISMA-SR guidelines, we searched Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library, and screened 2796 studies; 177 were included. Across 18,546 patients, 859 CN injuries were reported. The abducens (24.4%), optic (23.7%), and olfactory (18.6%) nerves were most affected, linked primarily to pituitary adenomas (34.49%) and sellar approaches (34.4%). Full recovery occurred in 38.4% of cases, while 29.9% had permanent deficits. Intraoperative neuromonitoring was reported in 34 studies, showing prognostic value but lacking definitive evidence for injury prevention. Only 5% of studies addressed postoperative management, highlighting a care gap. This review emphasizes the need for standardized reporting, enhanced monitoring, and robust postoperative strategies to optimize EEA outcomes. Future directions include prospective studies and patient-reported outcomes to refine skull base surgery safety.

International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology
Duke University (US), Duke Medical Center (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Head and Neck Surgical Oncology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.