From Stakeholder Pressure to Strategic Advantage: A Framework of Achieving Environment Sustainability Through Pathway of Carbon Neutrality

ABSTRACT Businesses are increasingly striving to reduce their carbon footprint, with carbon offsetting emerging as a viable pathway towards achieving carbon neutrality. Such efforts signify a demonstrated commitment to fostering environmental sustainability and contributing to a more sustainable future. Many countries have pledged to become carbon neutral in order to prevent climate change, but very little is understood about the micro‐level influences. Nevertheless, a critical question remains: To what extent can carbon neutrality be achieved without the active involvement of stakeholders? Current scholarly literature offers limited discussion on this issue, indicating a gap that warrants further exploration. Therefore, the study aims to investigate the key influence of stakeholders on businesses tending to achieve carbon neutrality via the use of green innovative practices in their pursuit of environmental sustainability. The semistructured interviews were conducted with the manufacturing industries' experts. Rigorously, a qualitative analysis was employed, and the five major drivers were identified based on 11 subthemes for carbon neutrality and green innovation, that is, ‘ customer enforcement ,’ ‘sustainable business value,’ ‘ potential benefits ,’ ‘ environmental legitimacy ’ and ‘ competitive pressure .’ Customers and competitors were the most influential external stakeholders. Shareholders and top management with intrinsic environmental values, being internal stakeholders, played pivotal roles in a proactive move to carbon neutrality and green innovation when there was limited regulatory pressure. The finding shows that the potential benefits of transitioning to carbon neutrality not only minimize waste and pollution but also lead to financial gains and a better image if implemented effectively, and the early movers/investors also believe in the long‐term economic benefits. Based on the research findings, a proposition‐based support framework was proposed by stakeholder and institutional theory to guide firms' managers in transitioning towards carbon neutrality goals or climate neutrality policies aligned with Sustainable Development Goal 13 (SDG 13).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Business Strategy and the Environment
Published
2026-03-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.70718
Primary Topic
Sustainable Supply Chain Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From Stakeholder Pressure to Strategic Advantage: A Framework of Achieving Environment Sustainability Through Pathway of Carbon Neutrality

Ashutosh Samadhiya, Sanjeev Yadav, Krishan Kumar Pandey, Sunil Luthra et al.
Business Strategy and the Environment
Sustainable Supply Chain Management
article

From Stakeholder Pressure to Strategic Advantage: A Framework of Achieving Environment Sustainability Through Pathway of Carbon Neutrality

Ashutosh Samadhiya, Sanjeev Yadav, Krishan Kumar Pandey, Sunil Luthra, Anil Kumar
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Businesses are increasingly striving to reduce their carbon footprint, with carbon offsetting emerging as a viable pathway towards achieving carbon neutrality. Such efforts signify a demonstrated commitment to fostering environmental sustainability and contributing to a more sustainable future. Many countries have pledged to become carbon neutral in order to prevent climate change, but very little is understood about the micro‐level influences. Nevertheless, a critical question remains: To what extent can carbon neutrality be achieved without the active involvement of stakeholders? Current scholarly literature offers limited discussion on this issue, indicating a gap that warrants further exploration. Therefore, the study aims to investigate the key influence of stakeholders on businesses tending to achieve carbon neutrality via the use of green innovative practices in their pursuit of environmental sustainability. The semistructured interviews were conducted with the manufacturing industries' experts. Rigorously, a qualitative analysis was employed, and the five major drivers were identified based on 11 subthemes for carbon neutrality and green innovation, that is, ‘ customer enforcement ,’ ‘sustainable business value,’ ‘ potential benefits ,’ ‘ environmental legitimacy ’ and ‘ competitive pressure .’ Customers and competitors were the most influential external stakeholders. Shareholders and top management with intrinsic environmental values, being internal stakeholders, played pivotal roles in a proactive move to carbon neutrality and green innovation when there was limited regulatory pressure. The finding shows that the potential benefits of transitioning to carbon neutrality not only minimize waste and pollution but also lead to financial gains and a better image if implemented effectively, and the early movers/investors also believe in the long‐term economic benefits. Based on the research findings, a proposition‐based support framework was proposed by stakeholder and institutional theory to guide firms' managers in transitioning towards carbon neutrality goals or climate neutrality policies aligned with Sustainable Development Goal 13 (SDG 13).

Business Strategy and the Environment
London Metropolitan University (GB), All India Council for Technical Education (IN), Jaipuria Institute of Management (IN), O. P. Jindal Global University (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Sustainable Supply Chain Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.