Securitization as a means to pay for cell and gene therapies for orphan diseases: a simulation study

Cell and gene therapies may provide life-extending treatments for patients. However, paying for these therapies using a single upfront payment will be challenging because of uncertainty about long-term clinical effectiveness and affordability. Developers, recognizing the challenges of paying for these therapies, have offered payers 5-year outcomes-based installment plans. The short length of these plans, however, does little to address uncertainties about the cost-effectiveness of paying for these therapies. Instead, we propose to offer 30-year performance-based annuities that shift payments to match the expected accrual of clinical benefits more closely. Using securitization techniques combined with long-term performance-based annuities, we demonstrate that in the case of the gene therapy Zolgensma, this mechanism is effective at mitigating concerns over value and affordability for payers. In summary, our proposal for financing cell and gene therapies creates a viable incentive for developers, while also balancing long-term effectiveness and budget impact concerns from payers and access challenges for patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Gene Therapy
Published
2026-03-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41434-026-00604-6
Primary Topic
Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Securitization as a means to pay for cell and gene therapies for orphan diseases: a simulation study

Avi Cherla, Adrian Carter, Elias Mossialos, John M. Lu
Gene Therapy
Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
article

Securitization as a means to pay for cell and gene therapies for orphan diseases: a simulation study

Avi Cherla, Adrian Carter, Elias Mossialos, John M. Lu
article en

Abstract

Cell and gene therapies may provide life-extending treatments for patients. However, paying for these therapies using a single upfront payment will be challenging because of uncertainty about long-term clinical effectiveness and affordability. Developers, recognizing the challenges of paying for these therapies, have offered payers 5-year outcomes-based installment plans. The short length of these plans, however, does little to address uncertainties about the cost-effectiveness of paying for these therapies. Instead, we propose to offer 30-year performance-based annuities that shift payments to match the expected accrual of clinical benefits more closely. Using securitization techniques combined with long-term performance-based annuities, we demonstrate that in the case of the gene therapy Zolgensma, this mechanism is effective at mitigating concerns over value and affordability for payers. In summary, our proposal for financing cell and gene therapies creates a viable incentive for developers, while also balancing long-term effectiveness and budget impact concerns from payers and access challenges for patients.

Gene Therapy
Department of Health and Social Care (GB), London School of Economics and Political Science (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.