Psychometric validation of the responsibility scale and the mediating role of psychological distress in the association between personal responsibility and wellbeing in arab adults

Responsibility plays a significant role in fostering mental health and wellbeing, encompassing personal accountability and societal contributions. This study aimed to validate the Responsibility Scale (RS), a psychometric tool designed to measure personal and social responsibility, using rigorous statistical methods. Participants included 256 adults (80.86% female) from diverse educational backgrounds, recruited through a convenience sampling method. Confirmatory factor analysis revealed a two-factor structure, comprising personal and social dimensions, with acceptable model fit indices (CFI = .96, TLI = .94, RMSEA = .080). Both factors demonstrated strong loadings (≥ 0.50) and robust internal reliability (personal responsibility subscale α = .92; social responsibility subscale α = .94). Convergent validity was supported by significant positive correlations of personal responsibility with life satisfaction, resilience, religious coping, self-esteem, and grit, whereas social responsibility showed weaker but significant associations with life satisfaction, self-esteem, and grit. Discriminant validity was evidenced by negative correlations of personal responsibility with psychological distress, whereas the association between social responsibility and distress was non-significant. Measurement invariance testing confirmed configural, metric, and scalar invariance across gender. Analyses further indicated that psychological distress carried an indirect effect of responsibility on wellbeing. Personal and social responsibility were positively associated with life satisfaction (β = .57) and negatively associated with psychological distress (β = − .47), suggesting that part of the effect of responsibility on wellbeing operates through reduced psychological distress. These findings position the RS as a reliable and valid tool for assessing responsibility across cultural contexts, with particular relevance to Libyan Arab populations. The study underscores the importance of responsibility for flourishing and offers new insights for both research and interventions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Psychology
Published
2026-03-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-026-04228-8
Primary Topic
Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Psychometric validation of the responsibility scale and the mediating role of psychological distress in the association between personal responsibility and wellbeing in arab adults

Mohamad Ahmad Saleem Khasawneh, Mohamed Bin Ali, Dimah Saleh Abdulaziz Alyousef, Saeed A. AL-Dossary
BMC Psychology
Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
article

Psychometric validation of the responsibility scale and the mediating role of psychological distress in the association between personal responsibility and wellbeing in arab adults

Mohamad Ahmad Saleem Khasawneh, Mohamed Bin Ali, Dimah Saleh Abdulaziz Alyousef, Saeed A. AL-Dossary
article en

Abstract

Responsibility plays a significant role in fostering mental health and wellbeing, encompassing personal accountability and societal contributions. This study aimed to validate the Responsibility Scale (RS), a psychometric tool designed to measure personal and social responsibility, using rigorous statistical methods. Participants included 256 adults (80.86% female) from diverse educational backgrounds, recruited through a convenience sampling method. Confirmatory factor analysis revealed a two-factor structure, comprising personal and social dimensions, with acceptable model fit indices (CFI = .96, TLI = .94, RMSEA = .080). Both factors demonstrated strong loadings (≥ 0.50) and robust internal reliability (personal responsibility subscale α = .92; social responsibility subscale α = .94). Convergent validity was supported by significant positive correlations of personal responsibility with life satisfaction, resilience, religious coping, self-esteem, and grit, whereas social responsibility showed weaker but significant associations with life satisfaction, self-esteem, and grit. Discriminant validity was evidenced by negative correlations of personal responsibility with psychological distress, whereas the association between social responsibility and distress was non-significant. Measurement invariance testing confirmed configural, metric, and scalar invariance across gender. Analyses further indicated that psychological distress carried an indirect effect of responsibility on wellbeing. Personal and social responsibility were positively associated with life satisfaction (β = .57) and negatively associated with psychological distress (β = − .47), suggesting that part of the effect of responsibility on wellbeing operates through reduced psychological distress. These findings position the RS as a reliable and valid tool for assessing responsibility across cultural contexts, with particular relevance to Libyan Arab populations. The study underscores the importance of responsibility for flourishing and offers new insights for both research and interventions.

BMC Psychology
Imam Mohammad ibn Saud Islamic University (SA), University of Ha'il (SA), Libyan Academy (LY), King Khalid University (SA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 36%
Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.