From Word2Vec to Transformers: Text‐Derived Composition Embeddings for Filtering Combinatorial Electrocatalysts

Compositionally complex solid solution electrocatalysts span vast composition spaces, and even one materials system can contain more candidate compositions than can be measured exhaustively. Here, we compare how five text‐derived composition representations influence the outcome of a common label‐free filtering task. A focused‐corpus Word2Vec model is compared with MatSciBERT and Qwen embeddings, with multicomponent compositions encoded either by concentration‐weighted element vectors or by full‐composition prompts. Similarities to the concepts conductivity and dielectric define a 2D semantic space in which the same symmetric Pareto‐front selection rule is applied to every representation. Across 14 combinatorial HER, ORR, and OER materials libraries, the representations produce distinct trade‐offs between candidate reduction and best‐current retention. MatSciBERT_Full gives the smallest subsets on average, whereas Word2Vec gives the smallest mean best‐current deviation while retaining comparably compact subsets. These differences show that representation construction changes the behavior of the same downstream filter.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Advanced Intelligent Discovery
Published
2026-09-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/aidi.70158
Primary Topic
Machine Learning in Materials Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From Word2Vec to Transformers: Text‐Derived Composition Embeddings for Filtering Combinatorial Electrocatalysts

Markus Stricker, Lei Zhang
Advanced Intelligent Discovery
Machine Learning in Materials Science
article

From Word2Vec to Transformers: Text‐Derived Composition Embeddings for Filtering Combinatorial Electrocatalysts

Markus Stricker, Lei Zhang
article en

Abstract

Compositionally complex solid solution electrocatalysts span vast composition spaces, and even one materials system can contain more candidate compositions than can be measured exhaustively. Here, we compare how five text‐derived composition representations influence the outcome of a common label‐free filtering task. A focused‐corpus Word2Vec model is compared with MatSciBERT and Qwen embeddings, with multicomponent compositions encoded either by concentration‐weighted element vectors or by full‐composition prompts. Similarities to the concepts conductivity and dielectric define a 2D semantic space in which the same symmetric Pareto‐front selection rule is applied to every representation. Across 14 combinatorial HER, ORR, and OER materials libraries, the representations produce distinct trade‐offs between candidate reduction and best‐current retention. MatSciBERT_Full gives the smallest subsets on average, whereas Word2Vec gives the smallest mean best‐current deviation while retaining comparably compact subsets. These differences show that representation construction changes the behavior of the same downstream filter.

Advanced Intelligent Discovery
Ruhr University Bochum (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Machine Learning in Materials Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.