Communication Structures That Hold Us Hostage: Conceptualizing Unlistening as an Organizational Practice

Listening is central to organizational life, yet many employees report persistent experiences of not being genuinely heard. This study conceptualizes such experiences as organizational unlistening and examines how they are socially coordinated and sustained despite rhetorical commitments to listening. Drawing on critical and sociocultural communication traditions and using Coordinated Management of Meaning (CMM) theory, the research analyzed 18 semi-structured interviews with employees. Thematic analysis identified a set of patterned communicative practices that normalize unlistening, including ritualized responsiveness, selective resonance, and symbolic legitimacy, showing how organizations structure what is heard and by whom. These findings reveal unlistening as an active, power-laden organizational practice that reinforces communicative closure and knowledge inequalities. They position unlistening as a distinct construct in business communication and emphasize the need for reflexive, system-level approaches to responsiveness that address communicative closure and sustain employee engagement.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Business Communication
Published
2026-03-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/23294884261422379
Primary Topic
Communication in Education and Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Communication Structures That Hold Us Hostage: Conceptualizing Unlistening as an Organizational Practice

Sanna Ala-Kortesmaa
International Journal of Business Communication
Communication in Education and Healthcare
article

Communication Structures That Hold Us Hostage: Conceptualizing Unlistening as an Organizational Practice

Sanna Ala-Kortesmaa
article en

Abstract

Listening is central to organizational life, yet many employees report persistent experiences of not being genuinely heard. This study conceptualizes such experiences as organizational unlistening and examines how they are socially coordinated and sustained despite rhetorical commitments to listening. Drawing on critical and sociocultural communication traditions and using Coordinated Management of Meaning (CMM) theory, the research analyzed 18 semi-structured interviews with employees. Thematic analysis identified a set of patterned communicative practices that normalize unlistening, including ritualized responsiveness, selective resonance, and symbolic legitimacy, showing how organizations structure what is heard and by whom. These findings reveal unlistening as an active, power-laden organizational practice that reinforces communicative closure and knowledge inequalities. They position unlistening as a distinct construct in business communication and emphasize the need for reflexive, system-level approaches to responsiveness that address communicative closure and sustain employee engagement.

International Journal of Business Communication
Tampere University (FI)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 36%
Communication in Education and Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Communication Structures That Hold Us Hostage: Conceptualizing Unlistening as an Organizational Practice — Sanna Ala-Kortesmaa · International Journal of Business Communication (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS