Machine learning prediction of aircraft anti-icing fluid endurance: A comparative study using natural and artificial snow data

• Machine learning predicts anti-icing fluid endurance time • Natural and artificial snow datasets jointly evaluated • Optimized XGBoost achieved RMSE of 10.65 minutes • SHAP analysis identifies dominant environmental drivers • Framework supports data-driven winter aviation decisions Ground ice poses a critical safety risk to winter aviation operations, primarily because the protective endurance of aircraft anti-icing fluids fluctuates unpredictably with volatile weather conditions. To mitigate these risks, this study develops a robust machine learning framework designed to forecast fluid endurance times using high-fidelity data from both artificial and natural snow environments. Research was conducted via endurance tests following the SAE ARP5485B protocol to train and evaluate multiple decision tree-based architectures, specifically the Decision Tree, Random Forest, and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) models. Model reliability was ensured through rigorous k-fold cross-validation and systematic hyperparameter optimization. Results demonstrate that the optimized XGBoost model achieved superior predictive accuracy, yielding an RMSPE of 15.38% and a MAPE of 8.88%. Furthermore, SHAP analysis identified snow deposition rate and ambient temperature as the most influential determinants of fluid failure. These findings suggest that integrating machine learning into endurance testing can revolutionize current safety protocols and facilitate precise, data-driven decision-making for winter ground operations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Aerospace Science and Technology
Published
2026-03-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2026.112103
Primary Topic
Icing and De-icing Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Machine learning prediction of aircraft anti-icing fluid endurance: A comparative study using natural and artificial snow data

Gelareh Momen, Jean-Denis Brassard, Haïfa Nakouri, Andres Cardona
Aerospace Science and Technology
Icing and De-icing Technologies
article

Machine learning prediction of aircraft anti-icing fluid endurance: A comparative study using natural and artificial snow data

Gelareh Momen, Jean-Denis Brassard, Haïfa Nakouri, Andres Cardona
article en

Abstract

• Machine learning predicts anti-icing fluid endurance time • Natural and artificial snow datasets jointly evaluated • Optimized XGBoost achieved RMSE of 10.65 minutes • SHAP analysis identifies dominant environmental drivers • Framework supports data-driven winter aviation decisions Ground ice poses a critical safety risk to winter aviation operations, primarily because the protective endurance of aircraft anti-icing fluids fluctuates unpredictably with volatile weather conditions. To mitigate these risks, this study develops a robust machine learning framework designed to forecast fluid endurance times using high-fidelity data from both artificial and natural snow environments. Research was conducted via endurance tests following the SAE ARP5485B protocol to train and evaluate multiple decision tree-based architectures, specifically the Decision Tree, Random Forest, and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) models. Model reliability was ensured through rigorous k-fold cross-validation and systematic hyperparameter optimization. Results demonstrate that the optimized XGBoost model achieved superior predictive accuracy, yielding an RMSPE of 15.38% and a MAPE of 8.88%. Furthermore, SHAP analysis identified snow deposition rate and ambient temperature as the most influential determinants of fluid failure. These findings suggest that integrating machine learning into endurance testing can revolutionize current safety protocols and facilitate precise, data-driven decision-making for winter ground operations.

Aerospace Science and TechnologyVol. 176
Université du Québec à Chicoutimi (CA), Institut Supérieur de Gestion de Tunis (TN)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Icing and De-icing Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.