Comparative evaluation of different layer thickness in 3D-printed endodontic guides: an in vitro study

Guided endodontics has become essential for achieving minimally invasive and predictable access cavity preparation in advanced canal obliteration. However, the dimensional accuracy of endodontic guides depends on several 3D printing parameters, particularly layer thickness. This in vitro study evaluated the effect of two different layer thicknesses—50 μm and 100 μm—on the dimensional accuracy of stereolithographically printed endodontic guides. Twenty-four endoguides were produced using a Form 3B+ printer (Formlabs, USA) with Biomed Clear Resin V2. Layer thickness was the only variable, while other printing parameters were standardized. After post-processing, specimens were scanned with a 3Shape E1 scanner, and STL files were superimposed using MeditDesign software. Dimensional deviations were calculated as root mean square (RMS, mm) values. Data were analyzed using an independent samples t-test (p < 0.05). Guides printed at 50 μm showed a mean RMS deviation of 0.066 ± 0.019 mm, while those printed at 100 μm exhibited 0.106 ± 0.035 mm (p = 0.002). Thinner layers resulted in significantly higher dimensional accuracy. Within the limitations of this in vitro study, reducing layer thickness significantly improved the dimensional fidelity of 3D-printed endodontic guides. However, although this difference was statistically significant, its clinical relevance should be interpreted with caution, as the absolute deviations observed in both groups were in the range of approximately 0.1 mm.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Oral Health
Published
2026-03-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-026-08067-2
Primary Topic
Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative evaluation of different layer thickness in 3D-printed endodontic guides: an in vitro study

Zeynep Özkurt Kayahan, İdil Özden, Hesna Sazak Ovecoglu, Yunus Emre Ozden
BMC Oral Health
Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments
article

Comparative evaluation of different layer thickness in 3D-printed endodontic guides: an in vitro study

Zeynep Özkurt Kayahan, İdil Özden, Hesna Sazak Ovecoglu, Yunus Emre Ozden
article en

Abstract

Guided endodontics has become essential for achieving minimally invasive and predictable access cavity preparation in advanced canal obliteration. However, the dimensional accuracy of endodontic guides depends on several 3D printing parameters, particularly layer thickness. This in vitro study evaluated the effect of two different layer thicknesses—50 μm and 100 μm—on the dimensional accuracy of stereolithographically printed endodontic guides. Twenty-four endoguides were produced using a Form 3B+ printer (Formlabs, USA) with Biomed Clear Resin V2. Layer thickness was the only variable, while other printing parameters were standardized. After post-processing, specimens were scanned with a 3Shape E1 scanner, and STL files were superimposed using MeditDesign software. Dimensional deviations were calculated as root mean square (RMS, mm) values. Data were analyzed using an independent samples t-test (p < 0.05). Guides printed at 50 μm showed a mean RMS deviation of 0.066 ± 0.019 mm, while those printed at 100 μm exhibited 0.106 ± 0.035 mm (p = 0.002). Thinner layers resulted in significantly higher dimensional accuracy. Within the limitations of this in vitro study, reducing layer thickness significantly improved the dimensional fidelity of 3D-printed endodontic guides. However, although this difference was statistically significant, its clinical relevance should be interpreted with caution, as the absolute deviations observed in both groups were in the range of approximately 0.1 mm.

BMC Oral Health
Yeditepe University (TR), Maltepe University (TR), Marmara University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.