Effect of Endodontic Sealers on the Bond Strength of Glass Fibre Posts: A Systematic Review

This systematic review evaluated the influence of resin-based, eugenol-based and bioceramic endodontic sealers on the bond strength of glass fibre posts cemented with resin cements. Searches were conducted in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar and Embase, including in vitro studies using human or bovine teeth restored with fibre posts. Risk of bias was assessed using the QUIN Tool. Thirty three studies met the eligibility criteria. Most evidence indicates that resin-based sealers promote higher bond strength values than eugenol-based sealers, whereas findings for bioceramic sealers were inconsistent. Only a minority of studies showed a low risk of bias, while most presented moderate methodological limitations. Substantial heterogeneity was also observed, including differences in irrigation protocols, sealer types, adhesive strategies and post-cementation intervals. Within the limitations of the available evidence, resin-based sealers appear to be the most favourable choice for clinical fibre post cementation. PROSPERO Registration Number: CRD42023467018.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Australian Endodontic Journal
Published
2026-03-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/aej.70066
Primary Topic
Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effect of Endodontic Sealers on the Bond Strength of Glass Fibre Posts: A Systematic Review

Jennifer Santos Pereira, Juliana D. Bronzato, Vanessa Gallego Arias Pecorari, Marina Angélica Marciano et al.
Australian Endodontic Journal
Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments
article

Effect of Endodontic Sealers on the Bond Strength of Glass Fibre Posts: A Systematic Review

Jennifer Santos Pereira, Juliana D. Bronzato, Vanessa Gallego Arias Pecorari, Marina Angélica Marciano, Thiago Bessa Marconato Antunes, Talita Tartari, Brenda P F A Gomes, Adriana de Jesus Soares
article en

Abstract

This systematic review evaluated the influence of resin-based, eugenol-based and bioceramic endodontic sealers on the bond strength of glass fibre posts cemented with resin cements. Searches were conducted in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar and Embase, including in vitro studies using human or bovine teeth restored with fibre posts. Risk of bias was assessed using the QUIN Tool. Thirty three studies met the eligibility criteria. Most evidence indicates that resin-based sealers promote higher bond strength values than eugenol-based sealers, whereas findings for bioceramic sealers were inconsistent. Only a minority of studies showed a low risk of bias, while most presented moderate methodological limitations. Substantial heterogeneity was also observed, including differences in irrigation protocols, sealer types, adhesive strategies and post-cementation intervals. Within the limitations of the available evidence, resin-based sealers appear to be the most favourable choice for clinical fibre post cementation. PROSPERO Registration Number: CRD42023467018.

Australian Endodontic Journal
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) (BR), Methodist University of Piracicaba (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.