Assessment of the Effectiveness of Food Safety Management Systems in Beef Abattoirs in Lusaka District, Zambia

Food safety management systems are central to controlling microbial hazards in abattoirs, yet their effectiveness depends on consistent implementation beyond documented procedures. In Zambia, persistent foodborne risks suggest that FSMS performance in beef abattoirs remains inadequately characterised. This study sought to assess the effectiveness of FSMS in beef abattoirs of Lusaka. A cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted in three consenting beef abattoirs in Lusaka district. The Food Safety Management System Diagnostic Instrument was used to evaluate core control and assurance activities, while the Microbial Assessment Scheme assessed microbiological performance. Fifty samples were collected across five critical sampling locations including carcasses at key processing stages (32), operators’ hands (9), and knives (9). Samples were analysed using selective culture media and biochemical confirmation. Data were analysed in SPSS version 28 using descriptive statistics and inferential statistics to compare contamination patterns across abattoirs. All abattoirs had implemented foundational FSMS like GMPs and SSOPs; however, only one facility had adopted the HACCP system. FSMS-DI results showed average performance for core control activities (mean = 1.86) and basic-to-average performance for assurance activities (mean = 1.78) and food safety indicators (mean = 1.56). Microbiological analysis detected Staphylococcus spp. (70%) and Escherichia coli (54%) as the most prevalent organisms, particularly at CSLs involving operator hands and knives. Klebsiella spp. (22%), Streptococcus spp. (24%), and Shigella spp. (6%) were also detected, while Salmonella spp. was not isolated. Significant differences in contamination were observed for E. coli and Klebsiella spp. across abattoirs (p < 0.05). Microbiological safety ratings classified of the beef abattoir was between poor to moderate. Despite the presence of foundational FSMS elements, inconsistent implementation particularly at critical sampling locations, highlights the need for strengthened HACCP adoption, targeted hygiene control, and enhanced regulatory oversight to improve beef safety in Lusaka.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
University of Zambia Journal of Agricultural and Biomedical Sciences
Published
2026-02-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.53974/unza.jabs.10.2.1670
Primary Topic
Food Safety and Hygiene
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessment of the Effectiveness of Food Safety Management Systems in Beef Abattoirs in Lusaka District, Zambia

Chisoni Mumba, Ethel M'kandawire, Chilufya Muya
University of Zambia Journal of Agricultural and Biomedical Sciences
Food Safety and Hygiene
article

Assessment of the Effectiveness of Food Safety Management Systems in Beef Abattoirs in Lusaka District, Zambia

Chisoni Mumba, Ethel M'kandawire, Chilufya Muya
article en

Abstract

Food safety management systems are central to controlling microbial hazards in abattoirs, yet their effectiveness depends on consistent implementation beyond documented procedures. In Zambia, persistent foodborne risks suggest that FSMS performance in beef abattoirs remains inadequately characterised. This study sought to assess the effectiveness of FSMS in beef abattoirs of Lusaka. A cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted in three consenting beef abattoirs in Lusaka district. The Food Safety Management System Diagnostic Instrument was used to evaluate core control and assurance activities, while the Microbial Assessment Scheme assessed microbiological performance. Fifty samples were collected across five critical sampling locations including carcasses at key processing stages (32), operators’ hands (9), and knives (9). Samples were analysed using selective culture media and biochemical confirmation. Data were analysed in SPSS version 28 using descriptive statistics and inferential statistics to compare contamination patterns across abattoirs. All abattoirs had implemented foundational FSMS like GMPs and SSOPs; however, only one facility had adopted the HACCP system. FSMS-DI results showed average performance for core control activities (mean = 1.86) and basic-to-average performance for assurance activities (mean = 1.78) and food safety indicators (mean = 1.56). Microbiological analysis detected Staphylococcus spp. (70%) and Escherichia coli (54%) as the most prevalent organisms, particularly at CSLs involving operator hands and knives. Klebsiella spp. (22%), Streptococcus spp. (24%), and Shigella spp. (6%) were also detected, while Salmonella spp. was not isolated. Significant differences in contamination were observed for E. coli and Klebsiella spp. across abattoirs (p < 0.05). Microbiological safety ratings classified of the beef abattoir was between poor to moderate. Despite the presence of foundational FSMS elements, inconsistent implementation particularly at critical sampling locations, highlights the need for strengthened HACCP adoption, targeted hygiene control, and enhanced regulatory oversight to improve beef safety in Lusaka.

University of Zambia Journal of Agricultural and Biomedical SciencesVol. 10(2)
University of Zambia (ZM)
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Food Safety and Hygiene
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.