A framework for merit, diversity, equity, and inclusion

Purpose This paper aims to offer a Critical Reflection on the emerging anti-diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) narrative that promotes merit-based selection as an alternative to DEI. This paper proposes a theory-driven framework that reframes DEI as a prerequisite for realizing true meritocracy in selection systems. Design/methodology/approach This paper applies the four mechanisms of critical reflection as outlined by Brookfield (2009). Findings The merit-based selection and DEI literatures stem from two distinct theoretical lenses, partially providing an explanation for why DEI and merit are discussed as distinct approaches to selection systems. This paper redefines the scope of DEI by providing a new understanding of the role of DEI policies and initiatives for achieving merit. Practical implications This paper outlines the importance of reframing DEI as merit-enhancing because hospitality and tourism must manage the diversity that is inherent in a global sector while navigating anti-DEI pressures driven more by politics than by business realities. Originality/value An anti-DEI narrative has recently emerged, calling for merit to replace DEI. However, there is a gap in the DEI literature that outlines its complementary role with merit. To address this gap, this paper offers a critical analysis of the emerging erroneous DEI versus merit debate.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management
Published
2026-03-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/ijchm-05-2025-0636
Primary Topic
Innovation and Socioeconomic Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A framework for merit, diversity, equity, and inclusion

Juan M. Madera
International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management
Innovation and Socioeconomic Development
article

A framework for merit, diversity, equity, and inclusion

Juan M. Madera
article en

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to offer a Critical Reflection on the emerging anti-diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) narrative that promotes merit-based selection as an alternative to DEI. This paper proposes a theory-driven framework that reframes DEI as a prerequisite for realizing true meritocracy in selection systems. Design/methodology/approach This paper applies the four mechanisms of critical reflection as outlined by Brookfield (2009). Findings The merit-based selection and DEI literatures stem from two distinct theoretical lenses, partially providing an explanation for why DEI and merit are discussed as distinct approaches to selection systems. This paper redefines the scope of DEI by providing a new understanding of the role of DEI policies and initiatives for achieving merit. Practical implications This paper outlines the importance of reframing DEI as merit-enhancing because hospitality and tourism must manage the diversity that is inherent in a global sector while navigating anti-DEI pressures driven more by politics than by business realities. Originality/value An anti-DEI narrative has recently emerged, calling for merit to replace DEI. However, there is a gap in the DEI literature that outlines its complementary role with merit. To address this gap, this paper offers a critical analysis of the emerging erroneous DEI versus merit debate.

International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management
University of Houston (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Innovation and Socioeconomic Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.