Assessment of the quality of EU boreal forest habitats of importance on the basis of indicators of natural structures and processes

All European Union countries are obliged to report on the status of EU forest habitats of importance, which needs to rely on assessments of their quality; however, standardised methods to accomplish this goal remain elusive. A survey of EU forest habitats of European importance in Latvia was conducted from 2017 to 2021, which resulted in a large dataset of structures, processes and species within forest patches identified as such. We analysed the quality of five selected boreal forest habitats ranging from moist to dry sites. Principal component analysis revealed the key natural structures and processes related to the quality gradient. These included uneven age structure, dead standing and fallen trees, polypores, old trees and gaps. The quality gradient based on indicators of naturalness was also associated with a nutrient and moisture gradient of site types and with dominant tree species; compared to poor dry sites with pine, rich site types with spruce and deciduous trees had higher quality based on structures and processes. This indicated that poor sites develop structures over a longer period of time, thereby having a lower quality assessment and being neglected for protection. The results of the study were used to rank the quality of EU forest habitats, which served to prioritise sites for protection. Considering the criteria and indicators used for assessing the quality of EU forest habitats, it is highly likely that the stands with highest quality can also be defined as old-growth forest.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Forest Research
Published
2026-03-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-026-01888-4
Primary Topic
Environmental Policies and Emissions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessment of the quality of EU boreal forest habitats of importance on the basis of indicators of natural structures and processes

Sandra Ikauniece, Didzis Tjarve, Iluta Dauškane, Brigita Laime et al.
European Journal of Forest Research
Environmental Policies and Emissions
article

Assessment of the quality of EU boreal forest habitats of importance on the basis of indicators of natural structures and processes

Sandra Ikauniece, Didzis Tjarve, Iluta Dauškane, Brigita Laime, Guntis Brūmelis, Jānis Ozols
article en

Abstract

All European Union countries are obliged to report on the status of EU forest habitats of importance, which needs to rely on assessments of their quality; however, standardised methods to accomplish this goal remain elusive. A survey of EU forest habitats of European importance in Latvia was conducted from 2017 to 2021, which resulted in a large dataset of structures, processes and species within forest patches identified as such. We analysed the quality of five selected boreal forest habitats ranging from moist to dry sites. Principal component analysis revealed the key natural structures and processes related to the quality gradient. These included uneven age structure, dead standing and fallen trees, polypores, old trees and gaps. The quality gradient based on indicators of naturalness was also associated with a nutrient and moisture gradient of site types and with dominant tree species; compared to poor dry sites with pine, rich site types with spruce and deciduous trees had higher quality based on structures and processes. This indicated that poor sites develop structures over a longer period of time, thereby having a lower quality assessment and being neglected for protection. The results of the study were used to rank the quality of EU forest habitats, which served to prioritise sites for protection. Considering the criteria and indicators used for assessing the quality of EU forest habitats, it is highly likely that the stands with highest quality can also be defined as old-growth forest.

European Journal of Forest ResearchVol. 145(2)
Latvia University of Life Sciences and Technologies (LV), Nature Conservation Agency (LV), University of Latvia (LV)
European Commission, Cohesion Fund
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Environmental Policies and Emissions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.