Student Age, Inclusion of LGB Topics, and Specifying Appropriateness on Support for Sex Education in the United States: Results From a National Survey Experiment

This study examines public opinion on school-based sex education using a survey experiment ( N = 1,003) that varies grade level (elementary vs. high school), the inclusion of Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual (LGB) topics, and whether the curriculum is labeled “age appropriate.” Support was lower for elementary school curricula and for those that included LGB topics. The “age-appropriate” label had no effect. Critically, respondents presented with high school curricula that included LGB topics were no more supportive than those presented with elementary school curricula that included LGB topics, indicating that disapproval of LGB inclusion did not depend on age. However, in open-ended responses, many justified opposing the proposal by invoking concerns about student age. This study examines sex education as a critical cultural domain, showing how public judgments about what should be taught and when are shaped by moral discomfort, levels of institutional trust, and perceptions of legitimacy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sex & Sexualities
Published
2026-03-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/30333717261416944
Primary Topic
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Student Age, Inclusion of LGB Topics, and Specifying Appropriateness on Support for Sex Education in the United States: Results From a National Survey Experiment

Tania Ravaei
Sex & Sexualities
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
article

Student Age, Inclusion of LGB Topics, and Specifying Appropriateness on Support for Sex Education in the United States: Results From a National Survey Experiment

Tania Ravaei
article en

Abstract

This study examines public opinion on school-based sex education using a survey experiment ( N = 1,003) that varies grade level (elementary vs. high school), the inclusion of Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual (LGB) topics, and whether the curriculum is labeled “age appropriate.” Support was lower for elementary school curricula and for those that included LGB topics. The “age-appropriate” label had no effect. Critically, respondents presented with high school curricula that included LGB topics were no more supportive than those presented with elementary school curricula that included LGB topics, indicating that disapproval of LGB inclusion did not depend on age. However, in open-ended responses, many justified opposing the proposal by invoking concerns about student age. This study examines sex education as a critical cultural domain, showing how public judgments about what should be taught and when are shaped by moral discomfort, levels of institutional trust, and perceptions of legitimacy.

Sex & SexualitiesVol. 2(1)
Indiana University Bloomington (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 36%
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Student Age, Inclusion of LGB Topics, and Specifying Appropriateness on Support for Sex Education in the United States: Results From a National Survey Experiment — Tania Ravaei · Sex & Sexualities (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS