The garden of evaluation approaches: Supporting explicit, theory-informed evaluation practice

This article presents an expanded Garden of Evaluation Approaches, a multidimensional framework that bridges theory and practice to strengthen evaluation in complex global contexts. The Garden now maps 13 approaches across intersecting dimensions and introduces two new elements: evaluand focus and lifecycle timing. Developed through systematic review and rubric-based analysis, it operationalises theoretical distinctions into visual profiles and evidence-based resource guides, enabling comparative learning, hybridisation, and context-sensitive design. By integrating underrepresented paradigms alongside established models, the Garden advances pluralism, equity, and methodological innovation. At the same time, it contributes to scholarly debates on classification logic and paradigm integration, offering a dynamic platform for research, pedagogy, and capacity-building. Designed as a living framework, the Garden invites co-creation and adaptation, positioning itself as both a practical decision-support tool and a catalyst for advancing evaluation theory and global practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Evaluation
Published
2026-03-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/13563890261421931
Primary Topic
Evaluation and Performance Assessment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The garden of evaluation approaches: Supporting explicit, theory-informed evaluation practice

Lyssa Wilson Becho, Daniela C. Schröter, Bianca Montrosse-Moorhead
Evaluation
Evaluation and Performance Assessment
article

The garden of evaluation approaches: Supporting explicit, theory-informed evaluation practice

Lyssa Wilson Becho, Daniela C. Schröter, Bianca Montrosse-Moorhead
article en

Abstract

This article presents an expanded Garden of Evaluation Approaches, a multidimensional framework that bridges theory and practice to strengthen evaluation in complex global contexts. The Garden now maps 13 approaches across intersecting dimensions and introduces two new elements: evaluand focus and lifecycle timing. Developed through systematic review and rubric-based analysis, it operationalises theoretical distinctions into visual profiles and evidence-based resource guides, enabling comparative learning, hybridisation, and context-sensitive design. By integrating underrepresented paradigms alongside established models, the Garden advances pluralism, equity, and methodological innovation. At the same time, it contributes to scholarly debates on classification logic and paradigm integration, offering a dynamic platform for research, pedagogy, and capacity-building. Designed as a living framework, the Garden invites co-creation and adaptation, positioning itself as both a practical decision-support tool and a catalyst for advancing evaluation theory and global practice.

Evaluation
University of Connecticut (US), Western Michigan University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Evaluation and Performance Assessment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The garden of evaluation approaches: Supporting explicit, theory-informed evaluation practice — Lyssa Wilson Becho, Daniela C. Schröter, et al. · Evaluation (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS