Family and professional experiences of safeguarding interventions during pregnancy: protocol for a qualitative evidence synthesis

<ns3:p>Background Over the past two decades, researchers have drawn attention to the numbers of babies removed from their parents at birth in England, as well as the rest of the United Kingdom, the United States of America, Canada, New Zealand and Australia. Pre-birth social work is intended to identify potential safeguarding concerns that may affect the parent(s)’ ability to care for the baby safely once born, put support in place to reduce risk, and recommend a plan for after the birth. For example, for the baby to remain in the care of parents or be placed in foster care or with relatives. However, research has identified that pre-birth social work does not consistently achieve these aims, and that the process can be distressing for parents, social workers, midwives and other allied professionals. The aim of this systematic review is to present decision-makers with clear, applicable guidance to improve key stakeholders’ experiences of pre-birth social work in England. Methods This review will adopt a qualitative evidence synthesis approach to analyse research that captures the views and experiences of parents and professionals involved in pre-birth social work in countries with a similar approach to child protection as England. The data will be analysed using framework analysis and the findings discussed with experts in practice and experts by experience to ensure the recommendations are relevant to the policy and practice context in England. In accordance with the guidelines, this systematic review protocol was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) on 20 January 2025 (registration number CRD42025639763).</ns3:p>

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
NIHR Open Research
Published
2026-02-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3310/nihropenres.14226.1
Primary Topic
Child Abuse and Trauma
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Family and professional experiences of safeguarding interventions during pregnancy: protocol for a qualitative evidence synthesis

H Ward, H Cann, B Steele, J Barlow et al.
NIHR Open Research
Child Abuse and Trauma
article

Family and professional experiences of safeguarding interventions during pregnancy: protocol for a qualitative evidence synthesis

H Ward, H Cann, B Steele, J Barlow, A Critchley
article en

Abstract

<ns3:p>Background Over the past two decades, researchers have drawn attention to the numbers of babies removed from their parents at birth in England, as well as the rest of the United Kingdom, the United States of America, Canada, New Zealand and Australia. Pre-birth social work is intended to identify potential safeguarding concerns that may affect the parent(s)’ ability to care for the baby safely once born, put support in place to reduce risk, and recommend a plan for after the birth. For example, for the baby to remain in the care of parents or be placed in foster care or with relatives. However, research has identified that pre-birth social work does not consistently achieve these aims, and that the process can be distressing for parents, social workers, midwives and other allied professionals. The aim of this systematic review is to present decision-makers with clear, applicable guidance to improve key stakeholders’ experiences of pre-birth social work in England. Methods This review will adopt a qualitative evidence synthesis approach to analyse research that captures the views and experiences of parents and professionals involved in pre-birth social work in countries with a similar approach to child protection as England. The data will be analysed using framework analysis and the findings discussed with experts in practice and experts by experience to ensure the recommendations are relevant to the policy and practice context in England. In accordance with the guidelines, this systematic review protocol was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) on 20 January 2025 (registration number CRD42025639763).</ns3:p>

NIHR Open ResearchVol. 6
University of Stirling (GB), Oxford Brookes University (GB), Oxford Policy Management (GB)
National Institute for Health and Care Research, Department of Health and Social Care
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Child Abuse and Trauma
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.