Beyond the black box: lessons in explainability from AI in mammography

Abstract With AI already in clinical use, mammography serves as a critical test-bed for the challenges and potential of medical AI. However, its progress is hampered by the ‘black box’ nature of current AI algorithms, limiting clinician trust and transparency. This review analyses the field of Explainable AI (XAI) as a solution, examining its motivations, methods, and metrics. We find the field is dominated by post-hoc saliency methods that provide plausible but not necessarily faithful explanations of AI decision-making. This focus has led to an evaluation gap, where localization accuracy is used as a proxy for explanatory quality without verifying the model’s true reasoning. Inherently interpretable models that could offer more faithful insights are rarely implemented, and a lack of human-centred studies further obscures the clinical utility of current XAI techniques. We argue that for AI in mammography to realize its full potential, the field must urgently shift focus from creating plausible explanations to developing and validating inherently interpretable systems that provide faithful, clinically meaningful insights.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Artificial Intelligence Review
Published
2026-03-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-026-11518-5
Primary Topic
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Beyond the black box: lessons in explainability from AI in mammography

Luigi De Angelis, Andrea Ciardiello, Guido Gigante, Anna D’Angelo et al.
Artificial Intelligence Review
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
article

Beyond the black box: lessons in explainability from AI in mammography

Luigi De Angelis, Andrea Ciardiello, Guido Gigante, Anna D’Angelo, Evis Sala, Stefano Giagu
article en

Abstract

Abstract With AI already in clinical use, mammography serves as a critical test-bed for the challenges and potential of medical AI. However, its progress is hampered by the ‘black box’ nature of current AI algorithms, limiting clinician trust and transparency. This review analyses the field of Explainable AI (XAI) as a solution, examining its motivations, methods, and metrics. We find the field is dominated by post-hoc saliency methods that provide plausible but not necessarily faithful explanations of AI decision-making. This focus has led to an evaluation gap, where localization accuracy is used as a proxy for explanatory quality without verifying the model’s true reasoning. Inherently interpretable models that could offer more faithful insights are rarely implemented, and a lack of human-centred studies further obscures the clinical utility of current XAI techniques. We argue that for AI in mammography to realize its full potential, the field must urgently shift focus from creating plausible explanations to developing and validating inherently interpretable systems that provide faithful, clinically meaningful insights.

Artificial Intelligence Review
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore (IT), University of Pisa (IT), Istituto Nazionale di Statistica (IT), Istituto Superiore di Sanità (IT), Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic (IT), Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.