Perceptions of Sustainable Dietary Practices : A Comparison Between Food and Nutrition Professionals and Food-Related Major Students in South Korea

This study examined the differences in the perceptions of sustainable dietary practices, as well as the perceived importance and actual performance of these practices, between food and nutrition professionals and students majoring in food-related fields in South Korea. An online survey was administered in October, 2024 to 70 professionals and 107 students. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and independent sample t-tests. The overall understanding of sustainable diets was moderate (M=3.46), with the highest scores observed in the health domain (M=3.80), followed by environment (M=3.65) and society (M=3.33). Across the three dimensions, the professionals showed significantly higher levels of recognition than the students, with a significant difference observed in overall understanding (p<0.05). Although the perceived importance of sustainable dietary practices was generally high in both groups, distinct domain-specific patterns emerged. Professionals placed greater emphasis on the health and environmental domains, whereas students prioritized the societal domain following health. In terms of performance, professionals reported higher engagement in health- and environment-related practices, while the students showed relatively higher performance in societal practices. These findings highlight distinct patterns in how professionals and students perceive and practice sustainable dietary behaviors, suggesting the need for tailored educational approaches.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the East Asian Society of Dietary Life
Published
2026-02-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17495/easdl.2026.2.36.1.13
Primary Topic
Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Perceptions of Sustainable Dietary Practices : A Comparison Between Food and Nutrition Professionals and Food-Related Major Students in South Korea

Eunseo Yang, Borham Yoon
Journal of the East Asian Society of Dietary Life
Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
article

Perceptions of Sustainable Dietary Practices : A Comparison Between Food and Nutrition Professionals and Food-Related Major Students in South Korea

Eunseo Yang, Borham Yoon
article en

Abstract

This study examined the differences in the perceptions of sustainable dietary practices, as well as the perceived importance and actual performance of these practices, between food and nutrition professionals and students majoring in food-related fields in South Korea. An online survey was administered in October, 2024 to 70 professionals and 107 students. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and independent sample t-tests. The overall understanding of sustainable diets was moderate (M=3.46), with the highest scores observed in the health domain (M=3.80), followed by environment (M=3.65) and society (M=3.33). Across the three dimensions, the professionals showed significantly higher levels of recognition than the students, with a significant difference observed in overall understanding (p<0.05). Although the perceived importance of sustainable dietary practices was generally high in both groups, distinct domain-specific patterns emerged. Professionals placed greater emphasis on the health and environmental domains, whereas students prioritized the societal domain following health. In terms of performance, professionals reported higher engagement in health- and environment-related practices, while the students showed relatively higher performance in societal practices. These findings highlight distinct patterns in how professionals and students perceive and practice sustainable dietary behaviors, suggesting the need for tailored educational approaches.

Journal of the East Asian Society of Dietary LifeVol. 36(1)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.