Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Ideology

Purpose Artificial Intelligence (AI) is embedded with different aspects of social, economic, political, cultural, religious, and technological lives of individuals and their everyday ideological interactions. Ideology continues to be the core of technological innovations and transformations. Therefore, AI is not free from ideological engagements. The paper outlines eleven level of conceptual framework to locate ideological foundations of AI. Design/methodology/approach This is a conceptual paper which follows the critical methodological tradition of Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA), particularly focusing on the concept of ideological interdiscursivity as outlined in the works of Algam and Jameel (2025), to analyse, understand, conceptualise and explain the ideological foundations of AI. Findings Through this multi-dimensional analysis, the paper constructs an ideological foundation and conceptual linkage between AI and ideology, offering an eleven-level conceptual framework to critically understand the capitalist ideological undercurrents embedded within AI. Originality This paper argues that AI interacts with ideology under two broad categories: essentialist and emancipatory aspects of AI. The essentialist aspects of AI come from its use value based on everyday functionality and requirements, whereas the emancipatory aspect of AI comes from its potential for the progressive transformation of society and the empowerment of individuals. Under these two broad categories, this paper explores the interactions between AI and ideology across eleven distinct but interrelated conceptual levels: abstraction, belief, critique, domination, facilitation, identity, integration, interpretation, process, and power. Research limitations/implications The paper constructs an ideological foundation of AI to critically analyse and locate the capitalist ideological undercurrents embedded within contemporary AI systems. In terms of future research, the paper offers an eleven-level framework for understanding and analysing the interplay between AI and ideology across local, regional, national, and international contexts. Practical implications In terms of policy implications, practical applicability and relevance, this paper situates itself within the domain of AI governance, ethics and policymaking, with a focus on the ethical and rational use of AI for the greater social good. Social implications The essentialist and emancipatory dimensions of AI, along with its ideological foundations, are central not only to understanding the power structures and ideologies shaping AI’s trajectory, but also to developing inclusive, people-centered AI policies that prioritise the well-being of humans, animals, and the planet. This calls for a vision of emancipatory and human-centered AI—an AI that truly serves humanity.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
London Met Repository (London Metropolitan University)
Published
2026-03-04
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Ideology

Nigel Walton, Bhabani Shankar Nayak
London Met Repository (London Metropolitan University)
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Ideology

Nigel Walton, Bhabani Shankar Nayak
article en

Abstract

Purpose Artificial Intelligence (AI) is embedded with different aspects of social, economic, political, cultural, religious, and technological lives of individuals and their everyday ideological interactions. Ideology continues to be the core of technological innovations and transformations. Therefore, AI is not free from ideological engagements. The paper outlines eleven level of conceptual framework to locate ideological foundations of AI. Design/methodology/approach This is a conceptual paper which follows the critical methodological tradition of Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA), particularly focusing on the concept of ideological interdiscursivity as outlined in the works of Algam and Jameel (2025), to analyse, understand, conceptualise and explain the ideological foundations of AI. Findings Through this multi-dimensional analysis, the paper constructs an ideological foundation and conceptual linkage between AI and ideology, offering an eleven-level conceptual framework to critically understand the capitalist ideological undercurrents embedded within AI. Originality This paper argues that AI interacts with ideology under two broad categories: essentialist and emancipatory aspects of AI. The essentialist aspects of AI come from its use value based on everyday functionality and requirements, whereas the emancipatory aspect of AI comes from its potential for the progressive transformation of society and the empowerment of individuals. Under these two broad categories, this paper explores the interactions between AI and ideology across eleven distinct but interrelated conceptual levels: abstraction, belief, critique, domination, facilitation, identity, integration, interpretation, process, and power. Research limitations/implications The paper constructs an ideological foundation of AI to critically analyse and locate the capitalist ideological undercurrents embedded within contemporary AI systems. In terms of future research, the paper offers an eleven-level framework for understanding and analysing the interplay between AI and ideology across local, regional, national, and international contexts. Practical implications In terms of policy implications, practical applicability and relevance, this paper situates itself within the domain of AI governance, ethics and policymaking, with a focus on the ethical and rational use of AI for the greater social good. Social implications The essentialist and emancipatory dimensions of AI, along with its ideological foundations, are central not only to understanding the power structures and ideologies shaping AI’s trajectory, but also to developing inclusive, people-centered AI policies that prioritise the well-being of humans, animals, and the planet. This calls for a vision of emancipatory and human-centered AI—an AI that truly serves humanity.

London Met Repository (London Metropolitan University)
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.