ofsi (pride)

The chapter explores the semantic field of ofsi and its uses in the Old Norse sagas, critically evaluating its customary translations of ‘pride, arrogance, tyranny’. The discussion demonstrates ofsi’s persistently negative connotations and highly subjective nature, drawing attention to the importance of social perception regarding the appropriateness of ofsi in a given context rather than its inherent quality as an emotional state. This appropriateness is explored in relation to gender, comparing the subtle ways in which accusations of ofsi differently affect men and women in the sagas, and to social hierarchy, pointing up the way ofsi functions in dialogue with key social factors. Rather than denoting an interior feeling, the chapter argues that ofsi is instead an interpretation of someone’s behaviour filtered through an external perspective and is used functionally by saga characters in order to rebuke someone they perceive to be acting inappropriately and encourage them to behave within more socially normative parameters. The chapter concludes by examining the range of emotion words with which ofsi is commonly juxtaposed. The contrasting of ofsi and foresight or forethought in several sagas, taken together with the fact that it is often parents who accuse their children of ofsi, suggests the term may carry further nuances of a particularly youthful or immature recklessness and disregard for future consequences.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham)
Published
2025-06-10
Primary Topic
Medieval Literature and History
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ofsi (pride)

Katherine Marie Olley
Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham)
Medieval Literature and History
article

ofsi (pride)

Katherine Marie Olley
article en

Abstract

The chapter explores the semantic field of ofsi and its uses in the Old Norse sagas, critically evaluating its customary translations of ‘pride, arrogance, tyranny’. The discussion demonstrates ofsi’s persistently negative connotations and highly subjective nature, drawing attention to the importance of social perception regarding the appropriateness of ofsi in a given context rather than its inherent quality as an emotional state. This appropriateness is explored in relation to gender, comparing the subtle ways in which accusations of ofsi differently affect men and women in the sagas, and to social hierarchy, pointing up the way ofsi functions in dialogue with key social factors. Rather than denoting an interior feeling, the chapter argues that ofsi is instead an interpretation of someone’s behaviour filtered through an external perspective and is used functionally by saga characters in order to rebuke someone they perceive to be acting inappropriately and encourage them to behave within more socially normative parameters. The chapter concludes by examining the range of emotion words with which ofsi is commonly juxtaposed. The contrasting of ofsi and foresight or forethought in several sagas, taken together with the fact that it is often parents who accuse their children of ofsi, suggests the term may carry further nuances of a particularly youthful or immature recklessness and disregard for future consequences.

Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Medieval Literature and History
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.