The transatlantic divide over AI is growing. Will China profit?:Beijing's agenda for the future of AI

The EU and the US increasingly find themselves at odds over competing approaches to AI governance. Although this transatlantic divide presents opportunities for China to emerge as a strategic beneficiary, this article argues that China is not overly concerned about this bilateral disagreement for three key reasons. Firstly, China’s commitment to an alternative model for global AI governance predates these divisions. Secondly, China understands that the internal rift between the EU and the US does not necessarily mean either will adopt the Chinese model. Thirdly, instead of merely exploiting divisions within the Western bloc, China aims to garner support from like-minded countries in the Global South. For transatlantic policymakers, the key takeaway is that the EU and US must first resolve their differences and seek common ground before worrying about Beijing exploiting divisions among democratic allies. The EU and the US should join forces to develop high-standard, reliable, and inclusive AI governance plans, even in the current volatile geopolitical landscape.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Research Publications (Maastricht University)
Published
2026-01-07
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The transatlantic divide over AI is growing. Will China profit?:Beijing's agenda for the future of AI

Catherine; id_orcid 0000-0001-7959-673X Lo, Hengyi; id_orcid 0009-0003-2397-4457 Yang
Research Publications (Maastricht University)
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

The transatlantic divide over AI is growing. Will China profit?:Beijing's agenda for the future of AI

Catherine; id_orcid 0000-0001-7959-673X Lo, Hengyi; id_orcid 0009-0003-2397-4457 Yang
article en

Abstract

The EU and the US increasingly find themselves at odds over competing approaches to AI governance. Although this transatlantic divide presents opportunities for China to emerge as a strategic beneficiary, this article argues that China is not overly concerned about this bilateral disagreement for three key reasons. Firstly, China’s commitment to an alternative model for global AI governance predates these divisions. Secondly, China understands that the internal rift between the EU and the US does not necessarily mean either will adopt the Chinese model. Thirdly, instead of merely exploiting divisions within the Western bloc, China aims to garner support from like-minded countries in the Global South. For transatlantic policymakers, the key takeaway is that the EU and US must first resolve their differences and seek common ground before worrying about Beijing exploiting divisions among democratic allies. The EU and the US should join forces to develop high-standard, reliable, and inclusive AI governance plans, even in the current volatile geopolitical landscape.

Research Publications (Maastricht University)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.