From Transition to Triage? Shifting Budget Priorities in the EU and Their Impact on the Green and Just Transition 2025 and Beyond

This brief developed under SLYCAN Trust EU Work Programme examines how shifting budgetary priorities across the EU and its Member States are reshaping the landscape for domestic investment in the green and just transition, ensuring that the transition towards a climate-neutral economy is taking place in a balanced way, leaving no one behind. Since 2020, successive crises—from the COVID-19 pandemic to Russo-Ukrainian war on Ukraine—have prompted the rapid reallocation of public resources toward security, defence, and industrial competitiveness. While climate goals remain formally embedded in EU strategies, fiscal and political realities are driving difficult trade-offs. Green and social transition spending is increasingly vulnerable: delayed, diluted, or deprioritised. The stagnation of EU Member States’ efforts under a baseline risk scenario is driven by a combination of factors: fiscal tightening, short-term challenges prompting budgetary reprioritisation, and political instability and fragmentation. Climate finance remains insufficient overall and lacks uniform and effective safeguards. Although the EU is striving to integrate environmental objectives within its defence and competitiveness agendas, doubts persist regarding monitoring mechanisms and the risk of greenwashing. Current developments indicate that despite its efforts, the EU remains off track to meet its 2030 and 2050 environmental targets. However, within the MFF 2028-2034 and the current presidency agenda, there is a clear intention to maintain climate concerns on the policy agenda. Flexibility, competitiveness, and security priorities must not – and do not need to – undermine or compete with environmental funding. Rather than mere coexistence, these objectives should be mutually reinforcing.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-11-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18851128
Primary Topic
Environmental and Biological Research in Conflict Zones
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From Transition to Triage? Shifting Budget Priorities in the EU and Their Impact on the Green and Just Transition 2025 and Beyond

SLYCAN Trust
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Environmental and Biological Research in Conflict Zones
article

From Transition to Triage? Shifting Budget Priorities in the EU and Their Impact on the Green and Just Transition 2025 and Beyond

SLYCAN Trust
article en

Abstract

This brief developed under SLYCAN Trust EU Work Programme examines how shifting budgetary priorities across the EU and its Member States are reshaping the landscape for domestic investment in the green and just transition, ensuring that the transition towards a climate-neutral economy is taking place in a balanced way, leaving no one behind. Since 2020, successive crises—from the COVID-19 pandemic to Russo-Ukrainian war on Ukraine—have prompted the rapid reallocation of public resources toward security, defence, and industrial competitiveness. While climate goals remain formally embedded in EU strategies, fiscal and political realities are driving difficult trade-offs. Green and social transition spending is increasingly vulnerable: delayed, diluted, or deprioritised. The stagnation of EU Member States’ efforts under a baseline risk scenario is driven by a combination of factors: fiscal tightening, short-term challenges prompting budgetary reprioritisation, and political instability and fragmentation. Climate finance remains insufficient overall and lacks uniform and effective safeguards. Although the EU is striving to integrate environmental objectives within its defence and competitiveness agendas, doubts persist regarding monitoring mechanisms and the risk of greenwashing. Current developments indicate that despite its efforts, the EU remains off track to meet its 2030 and 2050 environmental targets. However, within the MFF 2028-2034 and the current presidency agenda, there is a clear intention to maintain climate concerns on the policy agenda. Flexibility, competitiveness, and security priorities must not – and do not need to – undermine or compete with environmental funding. Rather than mere coexistence, these objectives should be mutually reinforcing.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Environmental and Biological Research in Conflict Zones
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

From Transition to Triage? Shifting Budget Priorities in the EU and Their Impact on the Green and Just Transition 2025 and Beyond — SLYCAN Trust · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS