A Theoretical Framework for Post-Conflict Business Development: Diagnosing Systemic Challenges in Rwanda (2000–2026)

The post-conflict economic landscape presents unique, systemic challenges for enterprise development that transcend conventional business theory. Rwanda's rapid yet uneven growth trajectory offers a critical case for examining the persistent structural and behavioural barriers facing firms in such environments. This article constructs a novel diagnostic framework to identify and analyse the interconnected systemic challenges inhibiting sustainable business development in post-conflict economies. It aims to move beyond generic growth models to specify the mechanisms of constraint. The framework is developed through a synthesis of institutional economics, behavioural finance, and conflict studies literature. It employs a systems-thinking approach to model the recursive relationships between formal institutions, informal norms, entrepreneurial psychology, and capital market imperfections. The framework identifies a self-reinforcing 'vicious cycle' where risk aversion in formal lending, partly driven by collateral deficiencies, exacerbates reliance on informal finance, which in turn limits firm scalability. A central theme is the critical misalignment between institutional reforms and deeply embedded behavioural legacies of conflict. Sustainable business development in post-conflict settings is fundamentally constrained by systemic interdependencies, not isolated factors. The proposed framework provides a necessary diagnostic tool for policymakers and scholars to pinpoint leverage points for intervention. Interventions should be systemic and simultaneous, targeting the alignment of financial institutions with behavioural realities. Policy must address the psychological legacies of conflict, such as truncated planning horizons, as diligently as legal and regulatory frameworks. post-conflict economies, systemic risk, behavioural finance, institutional voids, entrepreneurial psychology, diagnostic framework This paper provides the first integrated theoretical framework that explicitly links the behavioural finance of entrepreneurs with the institutional evolution of capital markets in a post-conflict context, offering a novel diagnostic mechanism for policymakers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-03-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18945511
Primary Topic
Natural Resources and Economic Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Theoretical Framework for Post-Conflict Business Development: Diagnosing Systemic Challenges in Rwanda (2000–2026)

Chantal Uwase Kayitesi, Jean de Dieu Uwimana
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Natural Resources and Economic Development
article

A Theoretical Framework for Post-Conflict Business Development: Diagnosing Systemic Challenges in Rwanda (2000–2026)

Chantal Uwase Kayitesi, Jean de Dieu Uwimana
article en

Abstract

The post-conflict economic landscape presents unique, systemic challenges for enterprise development that transcend conventional business theory. Rwanda's rapid yet uneven growth trajectory offers a critical case for examining the persistent structural and behavioural barriers facing firms in such environments. This article constructs a novel diagnostic framework to identify and analyse the interconnected systemic challenges inhibiting sustainable business development in post-conflict economies. It aims to move beyond generic growth models to specify the mechanisms of constraint. The framework is developed through a synthesis of institutional economics, behavioural finance, and conflict studies literature. It employs a systems-thinking approach to model the recursive relationships between formal institutions, informal norms, entrepreneurial psychology, and capital market imperfections. The framework identifies a self-reinforcing 'vicious cycle' where risk aversion in formal lending, partly driven by collateral deficiencies, exacerbates reliance on informal finance, which in turn limits firm scalability. A central theme is the critical misalignment between institutional reforms and deeply embedded behavioural legacies of conflict. Sustainable business development in post-conflict settings is fundamentally constrained by systemic interdependencies, not isolated factors. The proposed framework provides a necessary diagnostic tool for policymakers and scholars to pinpoint leverage points for intervention. Interventions should be systemic and simultaneous, targeting the alignment of financial institutions with behavioural realities. Policy must address the psychological legacies of conflict, such as truncated planning horizons, as diligently as legal and regulatory frameworks. post-conflict economies, systemic risk, behavioural finance, institutional voids, entrepreneurial psychology, diagnostic framework This paper provides the first integrated theoretical framework that explicitly links the behavioural finance of entrepreneurs with the institutional evolution of capital markets in a post-conflict context, offering a novel diagnostic mechanism for policymakers.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Delhi Development Authority (IN), Centre of Advanced Studies (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Natural Resources and Economic Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.