Regretting mother‐ and fatherhood in Switzerland: Equal parenthood regret but for different reasons

Abstract Objective This article investigates the prevalence of and factors associated with parenthood regret in Switzerland. Background There is increasing evidence that parenthood regrets occur both in mothers and fathers, but little is known about their causes and how they relate to gendered norms and conditions of parenthood. Method Based on a representative nationwide sample (1,923 women and 1,461 men), this study used the crosswise‐model design to address the sensitive question of parenthood regrets. The analysis is based on logistic regression models that are guided by directed acyclic graphs. Results An equal share (29%) of women and men at least sometimes regret parenthood. Fathers who view children as a source of reputation regret parenthood more often. Fathers who view children as a source of new ideas are less likely to regret parenthood. For mothers, circumstances, in particular age and relationship quality, are more important factors. Conclusion Mothers and fathers experience parenthood regret at similar rates. Although conditions of parenthood are especially important for mothers, fathers are more impacted by norms surrounding parenthood. Implications Family policies should focus on improving parenting conditions by addressing financial and caregiving burdens and specifically support men in strengthening their ability to make informed and intentional parenting decisions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Family Relations
Published
2026-03-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/fare.70088
Primary Topic
Family Dynamics and Relationships
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Regretting mother‐ and fatherhood in Switzerland: Equal parenthood regret but for different reasons

Sandra Gilgen, Larissa Fritsch
Family Relations
Family Dynamics and Relationships
article

Regretting mother‐ and fatherhood in Switzerland: Equal parenthood regret but for different reasons

Sandra Gilgen, Larissa Fritsch
article en

Abstract

Abstract Objective This article investigates the prevalence of and factors associated with parenthood regret in Switzerland. Background There is increasing evidence that parenthood regrets occur both in mothers and fathers, but little is known about their causes and how they relate to gendered norms and conditions of parenthood. Method Based on a representative nationwide sample (1,923 women and 1,461 men), this study used the crosswise‐model design to address the sensitive question of parenthood regrets. The analysis is based on logistic regression models that are guided by directed acyclic graphs. Results An equal share (29%) of women and men at least sometimes regret parenthood. Fathers who view children as a source of reputation regret parenthood more often. Fathers who view children as a source of new ideas are less likely to regret parenthood. For mothers, circumstances, in particular age and relationship quality, are more important factors. Conclusion Mothers and fathers experience parenthood regret at similar rates. Although conditions of parenthood are especially important for mothers, fathers are more impacted by norms surrounding parenthood. Implications Family policies should focus on improving parenting conditions by addressing financial and caregiving burdens and specifically support men in strengthening their ability to make informed and intentional parenting decisions.

Family Relations
University of Bern (CH), Bern University of Applied Sciences (CH), University of Zurich (CH), Zurich University of Teacher Education (CH), Pädagogische Hochschule Bern (CH)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 41%
Family Dynamics and Relationships
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.