Theory of Random Forests

Random forests (RFs) have a long history; they were originally defined by Leo but have antecedents in bagging methods introduced in 1996. They have become one of the most widely adopted machine learning tools thanks to their computational efficiency, relative insensitivity to tuning parameters, inbuilt cross validation, and interpretation tools. Despite their popularity, mathematical theory about the fundamental properties of RFs has been slow to emerge. Nonetheless, the past decade has seen significant advances in our understanding and analysis of these algorithms. In this review article, we describe several variations of RFs and how rates of consistency of these variants highlight the impact of different RF mechanisms on their performance. Another line of research focuses on establishing central limit theorems and confidence intervals for RFs. We also depict recent analyses in variable importance computed with RFs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application
Published
2026-03-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-statistics-112723-034707
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Machine Learning and ELM
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
52.10
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Theory of Random Forests

Erwan Scornet, Giles Hooker
1 citations
Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application
Machine Learning and ELM
52.10
article

Theory of Random Forests

Erwan Scornet, Giles Hooker
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Random forests (RFs) have a long history; they were originally defined by Leo but have antecedents in bagging methods introduced in 1996. They have become one of the most widely adopted machine learning tools thanks to their computational efficiency, relative insensitivity to tuning parameters, inbuilt cross validation, and interpretation tools. Despite their popularity, mathematical theory about the fundamental properties of RFs has been slow to emerge. Nonetheless, the past decade has seen significant advances in our understanding and analysis of these algorithms. In this review article, we describe several variations of RFs and how rates of consistency of these variants highlight the impact of different RF mechanisms on their performance. Another line of research focuses on establishing central limit theorems and confidence intervals for RFs. We also depict recent analyses in variable importance computed with RFs.

Annual Review of Statistics and Its ApplicationVol. 13(1)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Université Paris Cité (FR), Sorbonne Université (FR), Sorbonne Paris Cité (FR), Laboratoire de Probabilités et Modèles Aléatoires (FR), University of Pennsylvania (US)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Machine Learning and ELM
52.10
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.