Calibration Of Low-Cost Pm2.5 Sensors Using Data Continuously Generated At A Reference Station In El Paso, Texas

Low-cost sensors (LCS) offer a cost-effective way to expand air-quality monitoring networks, but they require strong calibration methods to ensure reliable performance under changing environmental conditions. In this study, Clarity LCSs were co-located with a state reference monitor for 6 months to evaluate fixed-time (2-, 3-, 4-, and 6-week) and rolling (2- and 3-week) calibration approaches. A multivariate regression model using PM1, PM2.5, PM10, and relative humidity was used to generate calibration coefficients for a “base sensor.” Data from two additional sensors were normalized to the base unit using linear regression, and their calibration coefficients were applied across the network. The fixed-time calibration using 6 weeks provides the best performance, based on its correlation to the reference station and the error metrics, indicating that its predictions are consistently close to observed values with minimal variability, followed by rolling calibration (3 weeks), which showed slightly weaker correlation but higher mean absolute error (MAE), which suggests less consistent performance.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
scholarworks - UTEP (The University of Texas at El Paso)
Published
2025-12-01
Primary Topic
Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Calibration Of Low-Cost Pm2.5 Sensors Using Data Continuously Generated At A Reference Station In El Paso, Texas

Brenda Lizbeth Hernandez
scholarworks - UTEP (The University of Texas at El Paso)
Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting
article

Calibration Of Low-Cost Pm2.5 Sensors Using Data Continuously Generated At A Reference Station In El Paso, Texas

Brenda Lizbeth Hernandez
article en

Abstract

Low-cost sensors (LCS) offer a cost-effective way to expand air-quality monitoring networks, but they require strong calibration methods to ensure reliable performance under changing environmental conditions. In this study, Clarity LCSs were co-located with a state reference monitor for 6 months to evaluate fixed-time (2-, 3-, 4-, and 6-week) and rolling (2- and 3-week) calibration approaches. A multivariate regression model using PM1, PM2.5, PM10, and relative humidity was used to generate calibration coefficients for a “base sensor.” Data from two additional sensors were normalized to the base unit using linear regression, and their calibration coefficients were applied across the network. The fixed-time calibration using 6 weeks provides the best performance, based on its correlation to the reference station and the error metrics, indicating that its predictions are consistently close to observed values with minimal variability, followed by rolling calibration (3 weeks), which showed slightly weaker correlation but higher mean absolute error (MAE), which suggests less consistent performance.

scholarworks - UTEP (The University of Texas at El Paso)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.