Parallels and Meridians in the Intuitionistic Fuzzy Triangle: A Confidence-Aware Framework for Decision Making

The paper proposes a completely new geometric interpretation of intuitionistic fuzzy sets for confidence-aware decision making. Instead of directly using ordered pairs of membership and non-membership degrees, we reinterpret the intuitionistic fuzzy triangle as a structured coordinate framework that simultaneously represents the evaluation outcomes and the evaluators’ expertise in the following manner: experts’ confidence levels are modelled with line segments parallel to the hypotenuse, while evaluation scores are represented by line segments radiating from the origin of the coordinate system toward the hypotenuse. Their intersections form a finite lattice of points whose total number depends on the chosen confidence and assessment scales. The proposed construction preserves the semantic foundations of intuitionistic fuzziness: points closer to the origin reflect higher uncertainty in the evaluator’s confidence, while points onto the hypotenuse represent determinate judgments (with varying degrees of positivity or negativity) based on the complete evaluator’s confidence. The geometric distances between intersections provide a formal explanation of varying discriminative power: assessments from highly confident reviewers are more distinguishable than those from less confident ones. In addition, a colour-based visualization further supports the intuitive interpretation of confidence-weighted evaluations. The proposed framework offers an alternative yet fully consistent way to model expertise-dependent decision processes within the intuitionistic fuzzy setting, bridging geometric insight and practical evaluation scenarios via a structured system of parallels and meridians.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Symmetry
Published
2026-03-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/sym18030468
Primary Topic
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Parallels and Meridians in the Intuitionistic Fuzzy Triangle: A Confidence-Aware Framework for Decision Making

Vassia Atanassova, Peter Vassilev
Symmetry
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
article

Parallels and Meridians in the Intuitionistic Fuzzy Triangle: A Confidence-Aware Framework for Decision Making

Vassia Atanassova, Peter Vassilev
article en

Abstract

The paper proposes a completely new geometric interpretation of intuitionistic fuzzy sets for confidence-aware decision making. Instead of directly using ordered pairs of membership and non-membership degrees, we reinterpret the intuitionistic fuzzy triangle as a structured coordinate framework that simultaneously represents the evaluation outcomes and the evaluators’ expertise in the following manner: experts’ confidence levels are modelled with line segments parallel to the hypotenuse, while evaluation scores are represented by line segments radiating from the origin of the coordinate system toward the hypotenuse. Their intersections form a finite lattice of points whose total number depends on the chosen confidence and assessment scales. The proposed construction preserves the semantic foundations of intuitionistic fuzziness: points closer to the origin reflect higher uncertainty in the evaluator’s confidence, while points onto the hypotenuse represent determinate judgments (with varying degrees of positivity or negativity) based on the complete evaluator’s confidence. The geometric distances between intersections provide a formal explanation of varying discriminative power: assessments from highly confident reviewers are more distinguishable than those from less confident ones. In addition, a colour-based visualization further supports the intuitive interpretation of confidence-weighted evaluations. The proposed framework offers an alternative yet fully consistent way to model expertise-dependent decision processes within the intuitionistic fuzzy setting, bridging geometric insight and practical evaluation scenarios via a structured system of parallels and meridians.

SymmetryVol. 18(3)
Bulgarian Academy of Sciences (BG)
Bulgarian National Science Fund
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.