A Comprehensive Review of Machine Learning and Deep Learning Methods for Flood Inundation Mapping

Flood inundation mapping (FIM) is essential in disaster risk management, infrastructure planning, and climate adaptation. Traditional hydrodynamic models, such as the Hydrologic Engineering Center’s River Analysis System (HEC-RAS) and LISFLOOD-Floodplain (LISFLOOD-FP), provide physically interpretable flood simulations but are often data- and computation-intensive and difficult to scale across regions. In recent years, machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) approaches have emerged as data-driven alternatives that leverage remote sensing observations, digital elevation models (DEMs), and hydro-climatic datasets to enable scalable and near-real-time flood mapping. Our review synthesizes recent advances in ML-based flood inundation mapping, categorizing methods into traditional machine learning techniques (e.g., Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machines (SVM), Gradient Boosting (GB)), deep learning architectures (e.g., Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), U-Net, Long Short-Term Memory networks (LSTM)), and emerging hybrid and physics-informed frameworks. We evaluate model performance across flood extent and flood depth estimation tasks, highlighting strengths, limitations, and common benchmarking practices reported in the literature. The review identifies key challenges related to model interpretability, data bias, transferability, and regulatory acceptance, and highlights recent progress in explainable artificial intelligence (XAI), uncertainty-aware modeling, and physics-informed learning as pathways toward operational adoption. By unifying terminology, performance metrics, and methodological comparisons, this review provides a coherent framework for advancing trustworthy, scalable, and decision-relevant flood inundation mapping under increasing climate-driven flood risk.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Earth
Published
2026-03-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/earth7020044
Primary Topic
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comprehensive Review of Machine Learning and Deep Learning Methods for Flood Inundation Mapping

Kshitij Dahal, Kenneth Okechukwu Ekpetere, Abinash SİLWAL, Mohamed Zhran et al.
Earth
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
article

A Comprehensive Review of Machine Learning and Deep Learning Methods for Flood Inundation Mapping

Kshitij Dahal, Kenneth Okechukwu Ekpetere, Abinash SİLWAL, Mohamed Zhran, Rajee Tamrakar, Anil Subedi, Dewasis Dahal
article en

Abstract

Flood inundation mapping (FIM) is essential in disaster risk management, infrastructure planning, and climate adaptation. Traditional hydrodynamic models, such as the Hydrologic Engineering Center’s River Analysis System (HEC-RAS) and LISFLOOD-Floodplain (LISFLOOD-FP), provide physically interpretable flood simulations but are often data- and computation-intensive and difficult to scale across regions. In recent years, machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) approaches have emerged as data-driven alternatives that leverage remote sensing observations, digital elevation models (DEMs), and hydro-climatic datasets to enable scalable and near-real-time flood mapping. Our review synthesizes recent advances in ML-based flood inundation mapping, categorizing methods into traditional machine learning techniques (e.g., Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machines (SVM), Gradient Boosting (GB)), deep learning architectures (e.g., Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), U-Net, Long Short-Term Memory networks (LSTM)), and emerging hybrid and physics-informed frameworks. We evaluate model performance across flood extent and flood depth estimation tasks, highlighting strengths, limitations, and common benchmarking practices reported in the literature. The review identifies key challenges related to model interpretability, data bias, transferability, and regulatory acceptance, and highlights recent progress in explainable artificial intelligence (XAI), uncertainty-aware modeling, and physics-informed learning as pathways toward operational adoption. By unifying terminology, performance metrics, and methodological comparisons, this review provides a coherent framework for advancing trustworthy, scalable, and decision-relevant flood inundation mapping under increasing climate-driven flood risk.

EarthVol. 7(2)
University of Kansas (US), Mansoura University (EG), European Space Policy Institute (AT), Peoria campus of the University of Illinois System (US), Saint Louis University (US), Arizona State University (US), Stony Brook University (US)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.