Exercise Interventions for Cognitive and Functional Outcomes in Dementia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Exploring Dose Metrics, Heterogeneity, and Implementation-Relevant Factors

<b>Background</b>: Exercise interventions are commonly considered as non-pharmacological approaches to support cognitive and functional outcomes in older adults with dementia. However, the effects reported in the literature remain heterogeneous, and commonly used time-based dose markers may be insufficient to explain variability across trials. <b>Methods</b>: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials was conducted in accordance with PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Eligible trials described benefits with cognitive, functional or behavioral changes associated with structured exercise interventions in older adults with dementia. Random-effects meta-analysis and meta-regression models were used to derive pooled effects and assess if linear dose indicators (e.g., duration of intervention, session length, frequency and total cumulative dose) reflected heterogeneity. <b>Results</b>: Twenty-two studies were analyzed. Based on our pooled analyses, a small but statistically significant improvement was observed under the fixed-effects model (g = 0.106, 95% CI 0.015-0.197; <i>p</i> = 0.023), but this was not significant for random-effects models (g = 0.117, 95% CI -0.021-0.254; <i>p</i> = 0.097), while suggesting moderate between-study heterogeneity (Q(21) = 43.530, <i>p</i> = 0.003; I<sup>2</sup> = 51.757%; τ<sup>2</sup> = 0.052). For the main random-effects meta-regression, standard linear dose indicators did not significantly explain between-study heterogeneity (Qm(3) = 1.06, <i>p</i> = 0.7867; R<sup>2</sup>_analog ≈ 0), while significant residual heterogeneity remained (I<sup>2</sup> ≈ 56.03%). <b>Conclusions</b>: In the literature so far, there are limited and heterogeneous effects of exercise interventions on cognition and functions in older adults with dementia. These findings in all literature suggest that the current evidence does not support a consistent linear dose-response relationship but rather will likely depend to some extent on feasibility and supervision (again, quality of the interventions), thus emphasizing that exercise strategies must be contextually sensitive rather than dose-dependent.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Healthcare
Published
2026-03-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare14050689
Primary Topic
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exercise Interventions for Cognitive and Functional Outcomes in Dementia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Exploring Dose Metrics, Heterogeneity, and Implementation-Relevant Factors

Chun-Hsien Su, Tsz-Ching Ng, Yi-Chen Cheng, Chun-Wei Lu
Healthcare
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
article

Exercise Interventions for Cognitive and Functional Outcomes in Dementia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Exploring Dose Metrics, Heterogeneity, and Implementation-Relevant Factors

Chun-Hsien Su, Tsz-Ching Ng, Yi-Chen Cheng, Chun-Wei Lu
article en

Abstract

<b>Background</b>: Exercise interventions are commonly considered as non-pharmacological approaches to support cognitive and functional outcomes in older adults with dementia. However, the effects reported in the literature remain heterogeneous, and commonly used time-based dose markers may be insufficient to explain variability across trials. <b>Methods</b>: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials was conducted in accordance with PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Eligible trials described benefits with cognitive, functional or behavioral changes associated with structured exercise interventions in older adults with dementia. Random-effects meta-analysis and meta-regression models were used to derive pooled effects and assess if linear dose indicators (e.g., duration of intervention, session length, frequency and total cumulative dose) reflected heterogeneity. <b>Results</b>: Twenty-two studies were analyzed. Based on our pooled analyses, a small but statistically significant improvement was observed under the fixed-effects model (g = 0.106, 95% CI 0.015-0.197; <i>p</i> = 0.023), but this was not significant for random-effects models (g = 0.117, 95% CI -0.021-0.254; <i>p</i> = 0.097), while suggesting moderate between-study heterogeneity (Q(21) = 43.530, <i>p</i> = 0.003; I<sup>2</sup> = 51.757%; τ<sup>2</sup> = 0.052). For the main random-effects meta-regression, standard linear dose indicators did not significantly explain between-study heterogeneity (Qm(3) = 1.06, <i>p</i> = 0.7867; R<sup>2</sup>_analog ≈ 0), while significant residual heterogeneity remained (I<sup>2</sup> ≈ 56.03%). <b>Conclusions</b>: In the literature so far, there are limited and heterogeneous effects of exercise interventions on cognition and functions in older adults with dementia. These findings in all literature suggest that the current evidence does not support a consistent linear dose-response relationship but rather will likely depend to some extent on feasibility and supervision (again, quality of the interventions), thus emphasizing that exercise strategies must be contextually sensitive rather than dose-dependent.

HealthcareVol. 14(5)
Shih Chien University (TW), Chinese Culture University (TW), Putian University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 36%
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.